On 06/26/2017 12:23 PM, Leo Vandewoestijne wrote: > So before I continue in making a meta-port or the knot2 port, just for the > sake of libknot, > I'm wondering; > wouldn't other OS'es packaging systems not benefit from having libknot > seperate from knot?
The typical setup in (Linux) distros is to have one source package for all knot-dns stuff producing multiple binary packages, e.g. libknot and libdnssec are typically in binary package(s) of their own. I personally don't think any further splitting would be good. --Vladimir _______________________________________________ knot-dns-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
