https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22456
--- Comment #70 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Lari Taskula from comment #66) > Comment on attachment 135839 [details] [review] > Bug 22456: Add waiting_hold_cancellation circulation rule > > Review of attachment 135839 [details] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/admin/smart-rules.tt > @@ +836,4 @@ > > </div> > > [% END %] > > > > + <div id="waiting-hold-cancel-category" class="container"> > > I'm curious why this configuration was added in its own section if it > contains the same three base parameters branchcode, patron category and > itemtype as the default circulation rules table? Not that anyone likes > worsening the horizontal scrolling but perhaps you had another reason in > mind. I hate the big table, and of course hate worsening it. I feel like this deserves its own section, and we could eventually group holds related policy in a single place as well, but out of the scope. So, this is just personal preference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
