https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36665
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #12) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10) > > I understand that you consider this critical and that you even bypass proper > > QA but maybe those remarks can be addressed on a separate bug, or at least > > we need plans for the next steps? > > I am not sure what steps here bypassed proper QA? A QA team member signed > off the bug - we then got a sign off from a community member (we attached > the sign off as they had issues using the sandboxes) and upgraded, with > their permission, the QA team members SO to QA. That discussion could have > been included on the bug, but I thought it was straightforward enough to > simply reorder the sign offs. I will file to follow-ups, but if you think > this needs more attention feel free to change the status. Personally if I add my signoff on a bug I don't necessarily do a proper code review. If I do signoff bug, don't swap it for a QA stamp :) Thanks for the follow-up bugs! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
