Le 31/01/2011 09:11, Marcel de Rooy a écrit : > > Just my late response on this thread: > > 3) Much depends on how the QA role is filled in [Ian’s plans sounds > good]. If the QA could give more guidance on which patches should be > tested next, testers are not just cherry picking patches.. Why should > QA not mail once a week or so the first 10 or 20 patches that he wants > to be signed? Could prevent older/larger/less interesting sounding > patches waiting and newer (smaller/..) patches getting signed and > pushed. Would make the process even more ‘fair’ to everyone. > Sounds like a very good idea. I've investigated a little big bugzilla to see if we could have a query showing what is to sign-off.
It seems that we have ... 164 bugs waiting for sign-off : http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=cf_patch_status&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=Needs%20Signoff I'm highly surprised by this number. Did I make a wrong query ? Is bugzilla uptodate ? I can't imagine there are so many patches awaiting QA, but maybe i'm wrong ;\ -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
