Hi Paul, On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Paul Poulain <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi all, > > I think there are some things unclear (at least for me ;-) ) about > submitting bugs with DB changes. > > <snip> > * we spoke of using XXXX in updatedatabase.pl to have te RM pick the > right number when needed. > Speaking from the prospective of Release Maintainer, this method works the most consistent for me. I have very few times when a DB update patch using the 3.NN.XXX format does not apply cleanly for me. This includes cases where NN == some subversion other than the current maintenance version. So with this, my workflow goes like this: 1. Apply patch/cherry pick. 2. Adjust rev number. 3. Commit rev number change. 4. Go on to the next patch. On the rare occasion the original patch does not apply cleanly it takes all of about one minute to fixup. So my vote is to use this method unless there is a very compelling reason to do otherwise. Kind Regards, Chris Koha 3.2.x/3.4.x Release Manager
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
