Le 23/05/2011 14:48, Chris Nighswonger a écrit : > So my vote is to use this method unless there is a very compelling > reason to do otherwise. What's happening with
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6328 (see comment 20) is interesting. I think the idea of atomic updates is very interesting. And the workflow/wiki must be updated anyway ! So I vote for atomic updates + updating the wiki to explain very clearly how to test a patch with a DB rev. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
