I can totally agree with this bit I would suggest it's best for the qa'er to be the final determiner of complexity.
Kyle Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On Aug 20, 2015 10:03 AM, "Marcel de Rooy" <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> wrote: > > So I suggest that for some patches, the ones with a minor severity, > > small or template changes could, IMO, bypass the signoff step. > > This idea comes up every now and then (just as we see our queues growing > and slinking again..). > I would suggest to make the Complexity field mandatory. Some people do not > fill it. > And if the Complexity== Trivial or String, test it yourself and put your > own signoff below. > Everything above Trivial needs another signoff. > > Marcel > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
