I can’t recall exactly how we use it but I think we count on the default behaviour as well. I remember discussing this with Katrin years ago.
But I also see the merit of requiring the biblio to be displayed because it contains links to the digital version of the resource. Many of our libraries create dummy items that contain links, but I prefer using the 856$u myself. David Cook Systems Librarian Prosentient Systems 72/330 Wattle St Ultimo, NSW 2007 Australia Office: 02 9212 0899 Direct: 02 8005 0595 From: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org [mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] On Behalf Of Tomas Cohen Arazi Sent: Friday, 28 July 2017 2:54 AM To: Eric Phetteplace <ephettepl...@cca.edu> Cc: koha-devel <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org> Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] OpacHiddenItems behaviour | Bug 10584 I completely agree we shouldn't introduce a behaviour change. I would rather propose being able to choose the behaviour, keeping the current as default. As we always do :-D I was just asking because it didn't seem natural to me. And the use cases I'm seeing require the biblio to be displayed, because it contains links to the digital version of the resource. Regards El jue., 27 jul. 2017 a las 13:26, Eric Phetteplace (<ephettepl...@cca.edu <mailto:ephettepl...@cca.edu> >) escribió: I can basically reiterate what Katrin said; we rely on this behavior and I wouldn't want it to change. Of course, implementing an opt-in syspref is a fine alternative. Depending on what's appropriate to your situation, it seems like you could just create a visible placeholder item as a workaround to get the bib to display. Best, ERIC PHETTEPLACE Systems Librarian libraries.cca.edu <http://libraries.cca.edu> | vault.cca.edu <http://vault.cca.edu> | 510.594.3660 <tel:(510)%20594-3660> <https://www.cca.edu/sites/default/files/images/2017/02/cca-sig-logo.png> 5212 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94618 1111 8th St., San Francisco, CA 94107 Preferred Pronoun(s): he/him :(){ :|: & };: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com <mailto:tomasco...@gmail.com> > wrote: El jue., 27 jul. 2017 a las 13:00, Katrin Fischer (<katrin.fischer...@web.de <mailto:katrin.fischer...@web.de> >) escribió: Hi Tomas, we rely heavily on the described behaviour to hide the record if all items are hidden. It seems logical to me - what will a user do with a record, that has no items? They can't place a hold, they don't know where to find it, which library owns copies etc. To me it seems more confusing then helpful. I think we shouldn't change the behaviour, especially because it has always worked like described and libraries might be unpleasantly surprised by a sudden change. Having the different behaviour as a configuration option would make sense. Yeap, I filed this bug to deal with this: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18989 Regards -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/> ) ✆ +54 9351 3513384 <tel:+54%209%20351%20351-3384> GPG: B2F3C15F _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org <mailto:Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/> ) ✆ +54 9351 3513384 GPG: B2F3C15F
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
