PART 3



>     IRISH NEWS ROUND-UP
>     http://irlnet.com/rmlist/
>     
>     Saturday/Sunday, 1/2 July, 2000
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> >>>>>> Book Review: The Deposition of Father McGreevy
>  
>  By Brian O'Doherty
>  Arcadia Books
>  Paperback #11.99
>  
>  
>  
>  Its part of the book reviewer's trade that you don't look at
>  previous reviews. This paperback edition had previous reviewers'
>  comments on the back from the hardback edition.
>  
>  I deliberately didn't look.
>  
>  There was one on the front that my eye couldn't help but stray
>  over as I sat down with this novel set in 1940s Kerry. The quote
>  was from a review in "Atlantic Monthly", describing the book as
>  "Bone-chilling".
>  
>  I put that to one side, ignored it, and tried to discount it as I
>  read O'Doherty's work. To no avail, I re-read the book after the
>  initial read. I'm still cold, shivered, like being a room with a
>  corpse alone.
>  
>  This is stunning stuff.
>  
>  Its no feelgood book, but its truth follows you after you've put
>  it down. Not since I read Liam O'Flaherty's "Skerret" in the 1980s
>  have I encountered a description of the West of Ireland that was
>  so shamefully accurate.
>  
>  This is nothing less that a literary treatment of the West of
>  Ireland psychosis that was so brutally laid bare by Nancy Scheper
>  Hughes in her excellent, if unethical, Saints, Sinners &
>  Schizophrenics (1979).
>  
>  One cannot argue with the fact that human communities have a
>  critical mass. If they grow beyond that, they usually sub-divide.
>  Dublin is made up of how many urban villages?
>  
>  As communities become progressively smaller they cease to be
>  viable. In this novel, a remote mountain village in Kerry is cut
>  off by the snow from the town, which represented the outside
>  world.
>  
>  During the harshest winter, the women of the village, one by one,
>  die of a mysterious, unexplained illness. This, for me, is a
>  powerful metaphor for the civic death suffered by women in that
>  patriarchal society.
>  
>  The main body of the novel - as the title suggests - is taken up
>  with the parish priest's recounting of what happened in the
>  village when it had to rely on its own dwindling resources,
>  material and human, in the harsh winter of 1940.
>  
>  O'Doherty examines all of our rural Irish Catholic baggage.
>  
>  He uses a native of the village who hears of its demise while
>  working in publishing in London in the 1950s. He - William Maginn
>  - is a distant relative of the good Father McGreevy - as we all
>  are.
>  
>  Father McGreevy is an interesting priest to come across these
>  days in Irish literature, a good one. Here, like all of us, is a
>  product of his environment and of his historical moment. He seeks
>  to explain the random cruelty of a chaotic universe within his
>  own belief system - a worldview inhabited by an omnipotent,
>  omniscient male deity.
>  
>  From the pages of O'Dohertys work you can taste this simple man's
>  despair at what his god is visiting upon his flock. The mountain
>  in winter will not yield to their efforts to allow a decent
>  burial for the women. Finally, church and state collude to clear
>  these people from their mountain. Father McGreevy bitterly notes
>  that not everything that has befallen the people of the West can
>  be laid at the door of the English.
>  
>  The story concludes with the psychiatric system incarcerating and
>  punishing two members of a community that the English speaking
>  Free State never understood, nor valued.
>  
>  As I said, this is not a feelgood book, but if you care about how
>  the West was lost after the British went, then start here.
>  
>  BY MICK DERRIG
>  
>  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> >>>>>>> Analysis: Time for deep breaths and deeper reflection
>  
>  By Robin Percival of the Bloody Sunday Trust
>  
>  Last Wednesday night, as most people settled down to watch the
>  Portugal v France European championship semi-final, there was a
>  well-attended public meeting in Derry.
>  
>  It was the first opportunity for the relatives of those killed,
>  the wounded, a few of their legal representatives and many of
>  their friends to draw breath and take stock of the significance
>  of what had happened as Christopher Clarke QC, counsel for the
>  Bloody Sunday Tribunal, finished the longest opening statement
>  (176 hours) in British legal history.
>  
>  Inevitably, it is the human tragedies, now given a renewed and
>  graphic reality by the evidence which Clarke has laid out, which
>  came to mind - the way Jim Wray was clinically executed by a
>  still anonymous para as he lay wounded on the ground in Glenfada
>  Park, or the way Alex Nash was shot and wounded, pleading for
>  help as he held his dying son, William, in his arms.
>  
>  At the meeting, William's sister, Linda, told of the way the
>  death of her brother had impacted on their lives - her mother was
>  never told the full circumstances of how her son had died, the
>  house raids that followed, of being strip-searched at the age of
>  16.
>  
>  It is clear that whatever else it does, the tribunal is already
>  providing a healing context for many in which their grief and
>  sense of bitterness and failure can be acknowledged and dealt
>  with.
>  
>  Inevitably and rightly there is still a huge sense of anger. Much
>  of it focused not only on the organisers and perpetrators of
>  Bloody Sunday, but on the former Lord Chief Justice Widgery,
>  whose original inquiry was such an outrage. Day after day, as the
>  opening address continued, it became increasingly clear that
>  there is now prima facie evidence that the Widgery Tribunal
>  itself was partly responsible for perverting the course of
>  justice.
>  
>  There is now significant evidence that but this whole charade
>  actually encouraged members of the parachute regiment to change
>  their original statements in order to exclude anything which
>  could point to criminal acts of wrong-doing.
>  
>  Lord Saville, in his opening statement in 1998, said that he did
>  not see it as being part of their task to comment on the conduct
>  of the Widgery Tribunal. Yet it is difficult to see how he and
>  the other two members of the inquiry can ignore and overlook the
>  extent to which the British legal system failed the people of
>  Derry and the loved ones of those killed when it allowed Widgery
>  to tamper with the evidence in the way that he did.
>  
>  Another theme that has emerged from this inquiry is the degree to
>  which - even now - the British army and the Ministry of Defence
>  feel able to snub their noses at the whole judicial process.
>  
>  The disclosure that the army had destroyed some of the guns used
>  in the killings after the tribunal had requested them, the false
>  and misleading "security assessments" provided to back the former
>  soldiers claim for anonymity, the failure to provide information
>  about which soldiers were in Derry on that day, all point to an
>  institution eager to undermine the work of the tribunal and to
>  prevent it from uncovering the truth, and which feels, as ever,
>  that it will get away with it.
>  
>  At the meeting in Derry, Eamonn McCann called for serious
>  consideration to be given to demanding that the parachute
>  regiment be disbanded. It was an idea that got a mixed reception.
>  
>  What about the responsibility of men like General Robert Ford,
>  who was in overall charge of the army that day in Derry? Or the
>  politicians in both Stormont and London who took the decisions to
>  unleash the paras on Derry?
>  
>  Nevertheless, the demand added emphasis to what many people in
>  Derry are saying. What do we expect from the tribunal? The truth,
>  yes. But is that all? Can 14 people be murdered on our streets
>  with nothing more than, perhaps, a statement of regret or even an
>  apology?
>  
>  Those campaigning around the issue of Bloody Sunday are now
>  increasingly focusing their attention on what needs to be done
>  when the tribunal is finished and its judgements handed down. It
>  is no longer just about remembering the past; it is about
>  changing the future.
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> c.  RM Distribution and others.  Articles may be reprinted with credit.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>                             RM Distribution
>                 Irish Republican News and Information 
>                      http://irlnet.com/rmlist/  
>                        
>  PO Box 160, Galway, Ireland           Phone/Fax: (353)1-6335113 
>  PO Box 8630, Austin TX 78713, USA     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> 
> RMD1000703120034p4
> 



Reply via email to