>        WW News Service Digest #201
>
> 1) Plant closings, layoffs loom at DaimlerChrysler
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2) Buffalo, N.Y., health-care workers ratify historic contract
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 3) Lessons from a steel mill
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4) How Cuba combated its economic crisis
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 5) Media give distorted view of Haitian vote
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 6) Israeli troops shoot to maim Palestinian youths
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>DETROIT: PLANT CLOSINGS, LAYOFFS LOOM AT DAIMLERCHRYSLER
>
>By Terri Kay
>Detroit
>
>DaimlerChrysler has launched a major restructuring of its
>Chrysler subsidiary, headquartered in the suburbs of
>Detroit.
>
>Coming at the same time as a downturn in automobile sales,
>this thinly disguised attempt to dismantle the former
>Chrysler Corp. could have grave consequences for the almost
>100,000 Chrysler workers. It portends a wave of massive
>plant closings and layoffs that could eliminate tens of
>thousands of jobs.
>
>This would have devastating effects on the largely African
>American city of Detroit, which is just beginning to recover
>from Chrysler's last major restructuring in the early 1980s.
>Then Chrysler eliminated 35,000 Detroit jobs in three years.
>
>DaimlerChrysler remains the biggest employer within the city
>of Detroit, and the biggest employer of African American
>workers among the Big Three automakers.
>
>DaimlerChrysler Chief Executive Officer Juergen Schrempp has
>already called for renegotiating the Auto Workers contract
>with concessions by the union.
>
>'MERGER OF EQUALS' MYTH EXPLODED
>
>In 1998 Daimler-Benz AG, based in Germany, bought out
>Chrysler Corp. in the biggest industrial merger ever.
>
>To get approval from the Federal Trade Commission and the
>Securities Exchange Commission, and to mute opposition from
>the Auto Workers and the public, Daimler-Benz promised that
>this would be a "merger of equals."
>
>It promised that Chrysler would continue to operate as a
>semi-autonomous unit, that there would be no plant closings
>and that the jobs of Chrysler workers would not be affected.
>
>However, in a recent interview with the Financial Times,
>Schrempp acknowledged that this "merger of equals" talk was
>a public-relations ploy to ensure government approval for
>the Chrysler buyout.
>
>Six of the eight Chrysler representatives on the
>DaimlerChrysler board of management have been removed.
>Schremp recently fired the Chrylser division's second
>president since the acquisition. He was replaced with two
>Daimler officers.
>
>Of course, these corporate executives were bought out with
>golden parachutes amounting to hundreds of millions of
>dollars.
>
>Before its acquisition by Daimler-Benz, Chrysler was rated
>the "leanest" of all automobile companies internationally.
>Chrysler's former officers had already implemented job speed-
>up, downsizing and outsourcing to non-union suppliers.
>
>Chrysler built up a $9 billion reserve for future product
>development on the backs of its workers through its "lean
>production" techniques. Daimler has used this fund to
>acquire a controlling interest in Mitsubishi, buy Detroit
>Diesel, start a sizeable joint venture with Caterpillar, buy
>into a more commercial truck venture and make many other
>purchases.
>
>FIGHT ANTI-GERMAN CHAUVINISM!
>
>Some rank-and-file auto workers and supporters say it's time
>to launch a campaign to demand that the government reopen
>its investigation into the Daimler-Benz acquisition of
>Chrysler, which was approved based on Daimler's fraudulent
>promises. The government, they say, must impose an immediate
>moratorium on all Chrysler plant closings and layoffs before
>they occur.
>
>Kirk Kerkorian, the billionaire who was Chrysler's biggest
>shareholder before the acquisition and is still
>DaimlerChrysler's third-biggest shareholder, has filed a
>lawsuit to reverse the Daimler buyout of Chrysler. Like the
>Chrylser executives, however, Kerkorian is only worried
>about protecting his own billions.
>
>Kerkorian is also trying to poison Chrysler workers with
>anti-German chauvinism and blur the class question, as if he
>were not just as ruthless as the Daimler bosses.
>
>"Only the Chrysler workers can defend their jobs," said
>Jerry Goldberg of the Detroit A Job Is A Right Campaign, a
>group that has fought plant closings and layoffs since the
>mid-1980s. "And they can only do it by building solidarity
>with German auto workers and fighting chauvinism.
>
>"The Chrysler workers must be independently represented in
>any government investigation of the Daimler buyout,"
>Goldberg said. "In fact, the workers should be made the
>trustees to manage and control the company's assets and stop
>Daimler's plundering."
>
>To implement their legal right to control over the
>corporation, and to guarantee that the plants are not sold
>off and closed, "the workers must take action now," he said.
>"Workers' control committees should be set up in each
>Chrysler plant. The workers should prepare to seize the
>plants and stop the sell-off of equipment to defend their
>legal and property right to their jobs.
>
>"There must be worker representatives on the DaimlerChrysler
>board of management to replace the eight former Chrysler
>executives who sold them out.
>
>"Chrysler workers must solicit support from IG Metall, the
>union representing Daimler workers in Germany. This union
>has fought militantly against corporate downsizing and would
>undoubtedly lend its solidarity to the Auto Workers union in
>this battle."
>
>Goldberg added: "Ultimately, only workers' control can
>protect the jobs and interests of the DaimlerChrysler
>workers. With a recession likely, a struggle by Chrysler
>workers to protect their jobs now can set the tone for
>working-class battles against plant and office closings and
>layoffs that will inevitably affect millions of workers in
>the next period."
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <008001c0620d$2f2625e0$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Buffalo, N.Y., health-care workers ratify historic contract
>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:23:52 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>BUFFALO, N.Y.: HEALTH-CARE WORKERS RATIFY HISTORIC CONTRACT
>
>By Beverly Hiestand, R.N.
>Chief Steward, Nurses United
>CWA Local 1168
>Buffalo, N.Y.
>
>Seventy-two hundred health-care workers in three unions
>ratified a truly historic five-year contract on Nov. 30. The
>pact was negotiated by a joint 16-unit bargaining committee
>with the goliath Kaleida Health Corp. These unions included
>Communications Workers Local 1168, Service Employees 1199
>Upstate, and Operating Engineers Local 71.
>
>Kaleida Health, a non-profit corporation, was formed in
>1998. It merged five major hospitals, including their home
>care and satellite facilities. Kaleida became the biggest
>health-care conglomerate in New York state outside of New
>York City.
>
>This merger resulted in fewer available beds and
>considerable downsizing of the combined work force.
>
>The merger could have wiped out all pre-existing union
>contracts, forcing the unions to start from scratch. But the
>unions quickly waged a struggle to pressure Kaleida's
>management to recognize all the existing bargaining units.
>The unions won formal recognition in the corporation
>charter.
>
>At the same time, these unions won the right to have one
>large negotiating committee representing 16 bargaining units
>immediately negotiate an agreement to protect workers'
>rights that were affected by the merger--including
>seniority, transfer and job security rights.
>
>They also won an agreement that all existing contracts would
>expire on the same date to be replaced by a new joint
>contract--the one signed on Nov. 30.
>
>ORGANIZING THE UNORGANIZED
>
>At the time of the merger over half the employees were not
>organized--a weakness in future bargaining power. So the
>unions bargained with hospital management and won the right
>to organize the unorganized using a method of card check--or
>simple recognition of the majority's sentiments--rather than
>going through the more common, slower and less fair
>procedure of a National Labor Relations Board election.
>
>But to secure this, the unions gave up the right to strike
>until the first contract was signed.
>
>In the ensuing two years CWA was able to organize almost all
>the remaining non-management employees. Now there are twice
>as many unionized workers as before the merger.
>
>As negotiations approached and the contracts neared
>expiration, the unions mobilized worker and community
>pressure on management. They organized slowdowns, work-to-
>rule actions and informational picketing to build support
>for the bargaining committee's demands.
>
>For the first time, nurses' aides, housekeepers, nurses,
>respiratory therapists and cafeteria workers all picketed
>together.
>
>There are strengths and weaknesses in the new contract. But
>most important, it returns the unions' right to strike.
>
>The contract also provides pay raises of up to 35 percent
>for some of the lowest paid workers. And it gets rid of pay
>inequities in the same job categories that allow management
>to move work to the lowest paid sites.
>
>Adequate staffing--one of the most urgent issues facing
>health care delivery here--was not resolved by the new
>contract. The number of employees has been reduced to bare
>bones because of cutbacks in Medicare funding and the
>overall drive for profits in the health-care industry. So
>health-care workers' unions here have been waging a larger
>campaign to restore federal and state funding to health care
>and to agitate for universal health care.
>
>But unions alone can't win this. No contract will solve the
>health-care crisis that has become a life-and-death issue in
>this country today.
>
>Racism, sexism, anti-gay and anti-trans bigotry are also
>barriers that keep many from the quality care they so
>deserve.
>
>Almost 50 million documented workers--and untold numbers of
>undocumented workers--are without health benefits. Hospitals
>and doctors' offices turn away countless people because they
>can't afford care.
>
>MERGERS EXACERBATE HEALTH-CARE CRISIS
>
>Pharmaceutical companies hold life-saving drugs for ransom.
>The big insurance companies and HMOs are more concerned with
>their profit margins than with patient care. And giant
>mergers have led to more layoffs and speed-up for health-
>care workers.
>
>But breaking up these conglomerates and going back to
>smaller, decentralized facilities is not the answer.
>
>In fact, the mergers are creating a new relationship of
>forces in the health-care industry. As the successful
>strikes of the UPS and Verizon workers proved, giant
>conglomerates haven't just made management more powerful;
>they have also concentrated and unified a larger, more
>powerful work force.
>
>The private capitalist ownership of industry and banking,
>driven by the profit motive, is a barrier to providing
>quality health care for all.
>
>The mergers set the stage for workers to take over these
>industries lock, stock and barrel in order to create a
>socialist economy based on planning to meet human needs.
>
>Every socialist revolution has decreed that health care be
>free of charge because it is a human right, not a privilege.
>In a socialist economy, health-care workers sit down with
>the communities they serve to determine how to ensure that
>cost-free, quality health care is the right of every human
>being.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <008801c0620d$44eaa860$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Lessons from a steel mill
>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:24:29 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>MARXISM, REFORMISM AND ANARCHISM:
>LESSONS FROM A STEEL MILL IN SLOVAKIA
>
>By Deirdre Griswold
>
>Who actually won the Cold War and who lost?
>
>Every new report on the living conditions of the workers in
>the former Soviet Union and the countries of Eastern Europe
>shows that their lives have deteriorated drastically since
>the breakup of the planned economies.
>
>But they're not the only losers. It's not far-fetched to say
>that workers here are also victims of U.S. imperialism's
>victory in the Cold War. That far-reaching triumph for U.S.
>corporations and banks has given the ruthless bosses a new
>club with which to beat down wages and assault unions.
>
>PHASE ONE: BREAK IT UP
>
>To illustrate what this means in practical terms, take what
>used to be the socialist country of Czechoslovakia in
>Eastern Europe. Capitalist reformers took over in 1989 in
>what was dubbed by the West the "Velvet Revolution." They
>broke it into two separate nations in 1993--the Czech
>Republic and Slovakia. But Czechoslovakia had been greater
>than the sum of its parts.
>
>Czechoslovakia was a world industrial power. It had many
>manufacturing industries based on steel, which it produced
>at a high level of quality. Czechoslovak workers took for
>granted many social guarantees like jobs, free health care
>and education, pensions, paid maternity leave and vacations,
>low-cost facilities for rest and recreation, and low prices
>for essentials like food and rent.
>
>One product made by Czechoslovak workers was the AK-47, the
>famous banana clip semi-automatic rifle used by the
>Vietnamese in their struggle for liberation. No one who was
>active in the anti-war movement in the United States will
>forget the photograph of a Vietnamese woman capturing a
>downed U.S. pilot twice her size. She was carrying an AK-47.
>
>The VSZ steel complex in Kosice, now Slovakia, employed tens
>of thousands of workers at that time. It was built in the
>1960s and is much more modern than many of the plants in the
>U.S. Midwest, which sneering economists have dubbed the
>"Rust Belt." It has automated ladles, controlled by workers
>far from the intense heat of the furnaces, which can pour
>180 tons of molten metal at one time.
>
>This mighty industrial complex was brought to its knees by
>the capitalist reformers, until it completely ran out of
>cash. The managers didn't have the money to buy the iron ore
>or the power needed to run the plant. Thousands of
>steelworkers were laid off, while the rest didn't know when
>they would be paid.
>
>PHASE TWO: TAKE IT OVER
>
>Now it has been sold to U.S. Steel for the bargain basement
>price of $450 million. This multibillion-dollar company,
>which along with Marathon Oil makes up the conglomerate
>known as USX, doesn't have to build new facilities or train
>new workers. Everything was right there waiting for them.
>
>The first phase of the transition to capitalism was the
>dismantling of the socialist economy in a way so painful for
>the workers that they would welcome anyone who could get
>production moving again.
>
>The second phase is for big imperialist corporations to pick
>up the pieces at rock-bottom prices.
>
>Phase one has been a disaster for the workers of the former
>Czechoslovakia. Phase two is proving to be a disaster for
>U.S. workers, too, who have been losing their jobs in droves
>as companies close their plants in the U.S. and move their
>capital to where desperate conditions have driven down the
>social wage.
>
>An article from Kosice, Slovakia, in the Nov. 30 New York
>Times explains what has happened since U.S. Steel bought the
>VSZ steel works:
>
>"For U.S. Steel, this is the first major expansion after
>more than two decades of relentless contraction. The Slovak
>mill will account for one-quarter of U.S. Steel's entire
>production capacity. With more than 17,000 workers, the
>operations here employ twice as many people as U.S. Steel's
>biggest American sites.
>
>"But while American steelworkers earn $35 to $42 an hour,
>wages here are about $2 an hour....
>
>"For Slovaks, the last few years have been grueling.
>Unemployment averages about 20 percent across the country;
>23 percent in Kosice. Real wages, adjusted for inflation,
>have declined more than 8 percent this year.
>
>"Here in Kosice, a picturesque city of 300,000, the
>municipal government is so short of money that it is trying
>to sell public forest land and buildings. Young people
>graduating from vocational school or the university set
>their sights on leaving, and many parents encourage them."
>
>When bosses see the possibility of cutting steelworkers'
>wages from $35 an hour--which of course includes benefits--
>to $2 an hour, there is no crime they will not commit.
>
>The irony is that many here in the labor movement
>facilitated the triumph of U.S. imperialism in the Cold War.
>The AFL-CIO of that time, under the conservative leadership
>of George Meany and Lane Kirkland, conspired with the
>Central Intelligence Agency and other counter-revolutionary
>arms of the government to help undermine the planned econo
>mies of the Eastern bloc.
>
>When the bourgeois reformers took over in Czechoslovakia,
>many people here and in western Europe who had been part of
>the progressive movements of the 1960s and 1970s fell for
>the propaganda of the corporate media and thought it was a
>victory for democracy and freedom. They hated the capitalist
>state with its repressive armies, police, jails and courts,
>and were easily persuaded that the states in Eastern Europe
>were even worse. They doubted that these were real workers'
>states because there was privilege and bureaucracy.
>
>THEORIES THAT HAVEN'T STOOD THE TEST OF TIME
>
>Some in the left movement added to the confusion by calling
>these societies "state capitalist." If they were indeed
>capitalist, and run by the state in an undemocratic and
>heavy-handed way to boot, then why should anyone defend
>them?
>
>Some of these "leftists" became the shrillest opponents of
>the Eastern bloc.
>
>What has happened since then, however, should sink in with
>anyone who cares about the working class. It should be
>crystal clear by now that, despite their imperfections,
>these states defended some very basic rights of the workers.
>Until their overthrow, they held the ravenous corporate
>globalizers from the U.S. and other imperialist countries at
>bay.
>
>In the new movement against globalization arising in the
>United States today, there is a strong anarchist tendency
>that dismisses all states as "authoritarian." Here again,
>those involved are repelled by the every-day brutality of
>the capitalist state, which all too often reaches lethal
>proportions.
>
>Marxism agrees with anarchism that the goal of the
>revolutionary struggle is a society without repression,
>without the compulsion of an armed state standing above the
>


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for geopolitics.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to