>people. But the question is, how to get there? How can it be
>done without asserting the authority of the working class
>and the oppressed? Once the old state is overwhelmed by the
>militant struggle of the people and dismantled, does this
>mean that the revolution has accomplished its goals?
>
>The day after the revolution, immense inequality will still
>exist. Some classes have enjoyed everything that society has
>to offer for generations; others have been virtually
>enslaved for generations. And that also goes for whole
>nations.
>
>There must be a plan to restructure human society so that,
>in as short a time as possible, those at the bottom can be
>lifted up while those who had been at the top are prevented
>from creeping back into positions of power and influence.
>And there must be a vigilant organization with the power to
>enforce the revolutionary will of the working class.
>
>Giving up state power to the new bourgeoisie--often without
>a fight--was the greatest sin of the bureaucrats in the
>former workers' states.
>
>As long as there is inequality in the world, there will be
>states. The difference between a capitalist state and a
>workers' state, however, is that the former exists to defend
>the privileges of a few, and is therefore self-perpetuating,
>while the latter exists to end privilege and create a
>classless society, thereby dissolving itself. As the
>revolutionary party realizes this goal, the state becomes
>more and more an organ to administer social and economic
>relations and less and less an organ of repression--until it
>ceases to be a state at all.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <009001c0620d$5b0c3f00$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  How Cuba combated its economic crisis
>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:25:06 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>HOW CUBA COMBATED ITS ECONOMIC CRISIS
>
>By Gloria La Riva
>Havana
>
>Revolutionary leaders who spoke at the Second World Meeting
>of Friend ship and Solidarity with Cuba here Nov. 10-14
>conveyed revolutionary optimism about the island's future
>and further encouraged the 4,000 international delegates to
>continue building the worldwide solidarity movement.
>
>It's that confidence in the revolution and 10 years of great
>sacrifices by Cuba's people and leaders that have assured
>the survival of its socialist system. While other countries
>have been dragged down by capitalist globalization, while
>hunger and misery are on the rise worldwide, Cuba continues
>to provide free health care, education and housing for all.
>
>Only a system based on human needs and free of profits has
>enabled the country to set priorities for resources and
>mobilize the people. The Cubans who spoke at the conference
>aptly communicated this.
>
>One of those leaders, Carlos Lage, addressed the delegates
>on the opening day. He delivered an illuminating speech on
>the factors in Cuba's economic recovery.
>
>Lage is second vice president of Cuba's Council of State. He
>has played a key role in formulating the country's economic
>strategy of the last decade.
>
>Cuba has endured one of the toughest struggles for survival
>any country has been subjected to.
>
>Beginning in 1990, Cuba had to withstand a double blow.
>First was the economic crisis brought on by the collapse of
>the Soviet Union, Cuba's main trading partner for almost 30
>years. Second was the harsh tightening of the U.S. blockade.
>Laws like the 1992 Torricelli Act and the 1996 Helms-Burton
>Act became part of the U.S. arsenal to try to asphyxiate the
>revolution.
>
>But Cuba not only survived--it has come through the test of
>fire with more unity, political strength and popular will to
>defend socialism.
>
>Lage spoke of how Cuba persevered against U.S. aggression
>and the socialist camp's disappearance.
>
>'HEROISM OF THE PEOPLE'
>
>"How have we been able to make the achievements we have?"
>Lage asked. "The principal reason is the heroism of the
>people, its capacity to resist, its stoicism, its confidence
>in the revolution and confidence in Fidel."
>
>Before 1989, advantageous trade agreements with the Soviet
>Union and the socialist camp enabled Cuba to develop.
>
>The Soviet leadership unilaterally suspended trade in 1990.
>The ensuing loss of imports brutally hit Cuba's economy.
>Imports dropped from $8.1 billion to $1.2 billion within one
>year.
>
>Food, medicine, fuel and energy, transport, industrial and
>agricultural production--all of the country's most essential
>needs were severely affected.
>
>Cuba seemed alone. The Eastern European countries had
>abandoned their socialist systems and succumbed to the siren
>song of capitalism.
>
>President Fidel Castro prepared the Cuban people for what he
>called a "Special Period in Time of Peace." He explained
>that the country would need solidarity, determination to
>defend socialism and an economic strategy to survive the
>crisis intact.
>
>"Fidel, at the beginning of the Special Period, said the
>first thing is to resist, the most important thing," Lage
>noted.
>
>"We applied economic changes that were inevitable. The
>socialist camp no longer existed. The loss of trade with the
>socialist bloc, in which we received preferential prices,
>coincided with a period of faster globalization all over the
>world.
>
>"[We undertook] absolutely essential changes so we could
>continue building socialism. It was not possible to conceive
>of an isolated economy; it is not necessary to close
>ourselves off to defend socialism. The main mechanisms we
>use are the mechanisms of socialism. Our main lever is the
>mobilization of the people."
>
>Instead of falsely describing the reforms as "market
>socialism," they were frankly explained as capitalist-style
>economic measures--steps backward needed to revive a
>devastated economy and preserve the socialist gains of free
>health care, education and housing for all.
>
>'WE DON'T SUBORDINATE OUR COUNTRY TO THE MARKET'
>
>Lage shed light on Cuba's socialist outlook in employing the
>reforms. He said that, although it's still virtually
>impossible for Cuba to obtain financial credits from abroad,
>"We will never accept financing with conditions, conditions
>that go against principles of the revolution and socialism.
>We still need to struggle for the people of the world. We
>don't subordinate our country to the market. Economics must
>be subordinate to politics."
>
>He explained that the government has accepted foreign
>investment only where Cuba doesn't have sufficient financial
>means or technology. "We don't need foreign investment to
>help us produce rum," Lage said, "what we need help with is
>marketing."
>
>So Cuba entered into an international marketing agreement
>while leaving the means of production in the hands of the
>workers' state.
>
>Foreign investment reached $4.5 billion in recent years.
>"But we have promoted foreign investment on very clear
>principles," Lage said. "The goal is not to turn the country
>over to foreign capital, but to attract capital to help us
>develop."
>
>The results have been impressive. In 1994, the peso had
>devalued to 150 per one U.S. dollar. Today the value is 20
>or 21 pesos to the dollar, a recovery unparalleled in the
>rest of Latin America.
>
>'WE STRUGGLE TO MAXIMIZE EQUALITY'
>
>Lage spoke about the difficulties Cuba still faces and the
>problems that have arisen with the introduction of
>capitalist measures.
>
>"Some inequalities have arisen," he reported, "but we
>struggle to maximize equality and minimize injustice. These
>inequalities are rejected by a large part of our people and
>we are opposed to them."
>
>Lage gave examples of some policies implemented to
>counteract inequality, like maintaining the food rationing
>system for every Cuban at 1960 prices. Medical workers' and
>educators' pay has been raised recently, he said.
>
>The population's caloric intake has also increased. Cuba's
>food crisis reached its worst level in the early 1990s, when
>daily caloric intake dropped under 2,000. Before the Special
>Period it was 3,000 calories; now Cubans are consuming 2,400
>calories per day.
>
>Power outages, which once lasted for hours almost daily, are
>virtually nonexistent.
>
>"We have overcome the worst," Lage stated, "but the harsh
>conditions still remain. Material constraints are worse than
>before the Special Period.
>
>"But we are fully optimistic about the future of the
>revolution," he said. "The blockade is not eternal; every
>day it is more scorned, even in the United States. Yesterday
>the United Nations General Assembly voted 167 in favor of
>ending the blockade. Three were against and there were four
>abstentions."
>
>Lage added: "The blockade can last 50 years or 1,000 years,
>but we will never surrender a single one of our principles.
>We will continue advancing. The revolution is stronger than
>ever, because we believe more in the ideas of socialism, the
>ideas of the revolution and of Fidel.
>
>"And I want to express the immense satisfaction that the
>Cuban people feel at your presence, true and dear friends of
>Cuba," Lage concluded. "The question at the first solidarity
>gathering in 1994 was not whether the revolution would
>survive, but whether you had faith in the revolution.
>
>"You had confidence in us, and it has been an extraordinary
>moral support for all Cubans."
>
>The writer was a delegate to the Second World Meeting of
>Friendship and Solidarity with Cuba.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <009801c0620d$6c5e7340$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Media give distorted view of Haitian vote
>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:25:35 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>ELECTION HYPOCRISY: MEDIA GIVE DISTORTED VIEW OF HAITIAN VOTE
>
>By G. Dunkel
>
>Jean-Bertrand Aristide will be Haiti's next president. He
>received over 91 percent of the votes cast in that country's
>Nov. 26 presidential election.
>
>A surprising number of North American newspapers covered the
>election. And not just major newspapers known for their
>international coverage, like the Washington Post, New York
>Times and Toronto Star.
>
>Nor was it confined to regional papers that serve areas with
>large Haitian communities, like the New York Daily News,
>Newsday, the Montreal Gazette, the Boston Globe and the St.
>Petersburg Times.
>
>Papers like the Calgary Herald, the San Diego Union-Tribune,
>the Houston Chronicle, the Omaha World-Herald and the St.
>Louis Post-Dispatch all ran stories or editorials on this
>election.
>
>You might think that among all these stories in papers
>spread over the vastness of North America there would be
>divergent views. But all of the commentaries were remarkably
>similar.
>
>Elections in Haiti were chaotic and badly run, they said.
>Jean-Bertrand Aristide and his party, the Fanmi Lavalas
>(Lavalas Family), would most likely win but there were no
>foreign observers to guarantee the integrity of the polling,
>they said.
>
>Parliamentary elections last May were rigged, they claimed,
>and the Election Board (CEP) was composed of Fanmi Lavalas
>partisans.
>
>Some reporters even interviewed Haitian "opposition" leaders
>without explaining their backgrounds, so workers here
>couldn't evaluate their charges.
>
>For example, when the Los Angeles Times quoted Chavannes
>Jean-Baptiste, a "peasant leader" in the Central Plateau who
>says he is "hiding from armed assassins," it should have
>also reported that he is in a political alliance with forces
>that supported the old Duvalier dictatorship and the 1991
>coup against Aristide.
>
>Other supposedly "independent" sources, like the Haitian
>radio stations Radio Metropole and Radio Galaxie, called the
>election illegitimate because "opposition parties did not
>participate." They gave wildly deflated estimates of voter
>turnout--5 percent or less. The official figure from the CEP
>said turnout was over 63 percent.
>
>A number of reports made a point of emphasizing the
>"violence" on election day. Two pipe bombs exploded in Port-
>au-Prince, Haiti's capital, and one or two elsewhere.
>
>But compared to earlier elections, there was no large-scale
>violence.
>
>ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
>
>Haiti Progress--a progressive newspaper that is published in
>French, Creole and English in Brooklyn, N.Y., and has
>editorial offices in Port-au-Prince and correspondents
>throughout Haiti--reported that the election represented a
>"people's victory" and was a "check to terror." It pointed
>out that the elections "unfolded with dignity and serenity."
>
>On Dec. 3 the New York Times Week in Review ran an article
>with the following admission buried near the end of the
>story: "... even diplomats and members of civic groups
>critical of Mr. Aristide admit that Lavalas enjoyed such
>popular support that it was virtually guaranteed convincing
>victories."
>
>While the big-business media were unanimously critical of
>Haiti's election, they all made a big point of saying it was
>not comparable to the mess a few miles north in Florida.
>This would be a "glib comparison," they said.
>
>Of course, Haiti is far poorer than Florida. Some polling
>places lacked electricity; paper ballots had to be counted
>by hand using candles or flashlights.
>
>But they were counted. The administrative problems due to
>Haiti's poverty were overcome and the results were announced
>within a week.
>
>Florida has electricity. But many of the votes cast by its
>Black citizens--including those of Haitian descent--will not
>be counted.
>
>The whole media campaign against the Haitian elections is
>consistent with the racist attitude the U.S. ruling class
>has held against Haiti since that country threw off its
>French slave masters and declared itself independent in
>1804.
>
>But it has another point too: to cast doubt on Aristide's
>victory and his support among the Haitian people. These are
>steps to prepare the U.S. people for intervention in Haiti
>against Aristide and the masses, to keep Haiti from
>following the example of its neighbor, socialist Cuba.
>
>For eyewitness reports on the Haitian elections, readers can
>visit the Haiti Progress Web site at www.haitiprogres.com
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00a001c0620d$80cba320$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Israeli troops shoot to maim Palestinian youths
>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:26:09 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Dec. 14, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>ISRAELI TROOPS SHOOT TO MAIM PALESTINIAN YOUTHS
>
>By John Catalinotto
>
>After a few days when the casualty numbers began to grow
>more slowly, Israeli military forces initiated a bombing
>attack on the West Bank town of Bethlehem Dec. 3.
>
>Israeli settlers, backed by the military, attacked
>Palestinian Muslims near the shrine of Rachel's Tomb.
>
>The two sides clashed for hours. Israeli helicopter gun
>ships opened fire with rockets at the nearby Aida refugee
>camp.
>
>Fourteen Palestinians were seriously wounded late Dec. 3 and
>early Dec. 4, Palestinian hospitals reported.
>
>So far almost 300 people have been killed in the fighting
>and close to 10,000 injured. Almost all those killed or
>seriously injured are Palestinians shot by Israeli troops
>and settlers.
>
>Israeli troops are ordered to shoot to maim the young
>Palestinian demonstrators, who are mostly armed only with
>stones and slingshots, by targeting their legs so that the
>victims are permanently disabled.
>
>According to an interview with an Israeli sharpshooter
>published in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the troops are
>not supposed to shoot at people unless "they are more than
>12 years old." This order came as result of the bad
>publicity after Israeli forces were videotaped murdering a
>Palestinian child who was trying to take cover with his
>father.
>
>After admitting they had killed the child, Israeli officers
>tried to claim he had been killed by the Palestinian side,
>in a vain attempt to reverse the bad publicity. This "big
>lie" came a little late.
>
>But Israeli forces have a public-relations problem because
>the vast majority of conflicts are between rock-throwing
>Palestinian youths and Israeli soldiers armed to the teeth
>with U.S.-provided machine guns, tanks, rockets, etc. Any
>honest reporting exposes these criminal attacks on a
>civilian population. So they have been using even harsher
>methods to control publicity.
>
>ISRAELIS TARGET JOURNALISTS
>
>According to a report published recently by the Committee to
>Protect Journalists, between Sept. 28 and early November, 24
>journalists covering the Intifada were injured or harassed--
>22 of them by the Israeli side. That includes shooting live
>ammunition at 13 journalists, holding journalists for
>questioning, preventing their entry into certain areas and
>confiscating press credentials.
>
>Of the three shootings the Israeli military investigated, it
>turned out the Israeli army had indeed shot the reporters.
>The report does not claim that the Israelis targeted the
>reporters, but some reporters believe they did.
>
>Not only have Palestinian youths been punished mercilessly
>for rising up against their occupiers, but the Palestinian
>population in general has been suffering from a siege of
>their territory and extensive curfews. Also Israeli
>settlers, often backed by troops, have destroyed hundreds of
>olive and orange trees that Palestinian farmers depend on
>for their livelihood.
>
>There are 195,000 Israeli settlers living among the 3
>million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. The settlers
>live in prosperous suburban housing on the hills near
>Jerusalem or scattered on the better farmland further away
>from Israeli towns.
>
>These settlers are connected to each other and to Israeli by
>a system of highways. Palestinians are not allowed onto the
>highways.
>
>When the Israeli regime denies freedom of movement to the
>Palestinians, it cuts off the major part of their income.
>That's why there are reports that the Palestinian population
>is on the verge of hunger in many areas.
>
>When Palestinian women demonstrated on Nov. 29, the Day of
>Solidarity with Palestine, they ended their demands with the
>following plea:
>
>"We mothers, wives and daughters can no longer endure seeing
>our loved ones killed, maimed and injured on a daily basis.
>Our Intifada is an expression of our quest for liberation,
>freedom and dignity. We appeal to all women of the world to
>understand our worthy cause and support us in our struggle
>for justice and peace."
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for geopolitics.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to