----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:27 PM
Subject: STRATFOR: Space Race Escalating [STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


STOP NATO: NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
Stratfor has factual info albeit a far right bent on occasion)


Escalating Space Race

Summary

The global economy's growing dependence on space technology is
reigniting the debate over the military's function in space,
particularly its role in denying enemies the ability to use the
ultimate high ground for nefarious purposes. Stimulated by the new
political leadership emerging in the United States, the escalating
space race will turn the final frontier into a new battleground in
the 21st century.

Analysis

On Jan. 11 the Commission to Assess U.S. National Security Space
Management and Organization is to release its findings after more
than a year of study. Established by members of Congress
concerned that preparations for the space age are inadequate, the
commission has the potential to forcefully and immediately impact
American policy.

The commission was led by Donald Rumsfeld, President-elect George
W. Bush's nominee for secretary of defense, who has pledged to
make the "defense of space assets" a top priority. The commission
will find the new U.S. administration highly receptive to
accelerating the space race with military projects and
government-assisted programs for civilian purposes.

The trend toward a larger international presence in space, and
the associated risks that come with heavy reliance on space
systems, has moved the United States closer than ever - both
politically and technologically - to crossing the boundary
between using space to support military operations and making
space a combat zone. The incoming U.S. administration, and its
unfolding world view, will run right up against this sacrosanct
boundary in international relations and may even cross it,
irreversibly altering the strategic landscape.

Reliance on space for communications, navigation, reconnaissance,
weather prediction and a host of other disciplines is growing by
leaps and bounds, fueling billions of dollars in investment
around the world - $100 billion in investment by the United
States alone. At least 1,500 new satellites will be launched
internationally over the next decade to add to the estimated 600
now in orbit.

Many advances in space technology are now being spearheaded
outside the United States. The United States has developed only
one new booster rocket in the last 20 years, while Russia has
developed and tested more than 140. In other areas, such as the
satellite surveillance and space exploration, countries like
Russia, China, Japan and India are doing a good job of keeping
pace with the United States.

China, for example, plans this year to place a human in orbit for
the first time and recently launched a high-resolution commercial
imaging satellite.

Japan, meanwhile, has embarked on a satellite reconnaissance
program of its own that will give its military greater autonomy
from the United States.

This highly competitive environment in the space industry has
coincided with - and at the same time fueled - growing American
military anxiety that new technologies becoming widely available
will seriously endanger space operations.

This includes anti-satellite laser weapons and new computer tools
to disrupt or corrupt satellite data. Russia is believed to have
developed anti-satellite weapons, while China is said to be
aggressively pursuing them. The United States will redouble its
efforts to develop anti-satellite weapons as Russia and China's
space programs grow.

"Protecting our ability to launch and operate satellites - and
denying an enemy the same ability - could be pivotal to the
success of future U.S. military operations," according to the
U.S. Space Command mission statement. "The increasing reliance of
joint forces on space means we must achieve space superiority in
times of conflict. Likewise, we must be able to preserve civil
and commercial access to space."

The space commission's report is likely to call for enhancing
satellite defenses and space control capabilities. It may call
for renewed testing of the Mid Range Advanced Chemical Laser, a
ground-based anti-satellite weapon that has not been tested in
several years. When tested in 1997, domestic and foreign
criticism was widespread. Russian President Boris Yeltsin
personally intervened to try and stop the tests, warning against
the danger of weaponizing space.

The commission will probably also recommend some structural
changes within the military, including tapping the Air Force as
the "executive agent" for space operations. The commission had
even considered establishing a separate Space Force or Space
Corps of 30,000 troops, but that proposal appears to have been
shelved as too controversial.

The commission is less likely to recommend deploying offensive
weapons in space, but some concrete steps in that direction will
at least be on the table as Rumsfeld moves into his Pentagon
office.

One of these steps might be to accelerate research on a so-called
Space Based Laser. The Pentagon recently cut a check for a $100
million to conduct a flight test of a subscale vehicle designed
to house a high-powered laser to attack missiles and other
targets from space.

The 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty prohibits the United
States from deploying laser weapons in space; however, Bush has
said he will either change or scrap the treaty with Russia to
deploy the proposed nationwide missile shield. Bush has also
pledged to develop a more comprehensive missile defense, possibly
including weapons deployed in space.

Specifics aside, what is clear is that the Bush national security
team will have an early blueprint, provided by one of its most
veteran and influential members, for how the military should
proceed in outer space. And the watchwords of the blueprint will
no doubt include space "control" and "dominance."

The weaponization of space may be inevitable. However, fierce
international competition in commercial and military space
ventures, combined with a U.S. administration seeking to prevail
over all other comers, is placing the space race on a collision
course with the point of no return: warfare in space.

With a secretary of defense intellectually inclined to up the
ante in space, the United States is set to preside over the
countdown and possibly the blastoff.

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
  Dial 800-555-TELL. Instant updates - One free call.
  Sports, stocks, driving directions...& much more!

   http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/tellme1
----------------------------------------------------------------------

+ Please support:
http://www.antiwar.com and
http://www.space4peace.org
Deo Gratias +
================= + ===============




______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to