[Via... http://www.egroups.com/group/Communist-Internet ]
.
.
----- Original Message -----
From: Miroslav Antic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; NATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; BALKAN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; SNN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:31 PM
Subject: NATO lashes out at bizarre reports on missile plan [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


STOP NATO: NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
     1.  Fill in the brief application
     2.  Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
     3.  Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATO lashes out at bizarre reports on missile plan

Budapest (dpa) - NATO Secretary General George Robertson Wednesday lashed
out at "bizarre" press coverage of an alleged split in the Alliance over the
U.S. missile defence plans.

"The U.S. brought no firm proposals because they have none," Robertson told
reporters.

"There was no division, no falling out...the 19 NATO members are in a
thinking process together in serious and business-like fashion," the NATO
chief insisted.

"It was pure invention to suggest that a plan was flogged when none was
tabled," he complained.

U.S. press reports from Tuesday's meeting between U.S. Secretary of State
Colin Powell and NATO allies referred to an Alliance rift over America's
plans for missile defence.

Washington's NATO partners had failed to endorse the deployment of a missile
shield against rogue nations, the reports said.

But Robertson and U.S. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said
Washington was still in the process of consulting its allies on the issue.

"Nobody criticised us," Boucher insisted.

Miroslav Antic,
http://www.antic.org/


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to