From: poblachtach dearg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 16:52:12 +0100 (BST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Peoples War] NATO Preparing invasion! Macedonians fight back!

URL for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/rozoff/shrill.htm
To Join Emperor's Clothes Email list go to
http://emperors-clothes.com/feedback.htm - We Send About One Emperor's
Clothes Article a Day

http://www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]

AND NOW FOR SOMETHING REALLY SHRILL ABOUT MACEDONIA...
by Rick Rozoff and Jared Israel [27 July 2001]

Today Agence France Presse (AFP) published a report about protest
demonstrations in Macedonia.

The 'AFP' report contains the shrill, defamatory stereotypes used with
increasing frequency in the Western media to describe Macedonians, both
ordinary citizens and officials.

We are witnessing one of those media campaigns so uniform, scripted and
predictable - and consistently inaccurate - that one has to suspect
coordination between the controlling elements of the news media and
certain Western foreign offices and covert services.

Examples abound in this brief 'AFP' dispatch. Macedonians are
pointedly, repeatedly and gratuitously identified as 'Slavs' (as opposed to
what 
they are - Macedonians!) and their actions are labeled with such
pejorative terms as: 'irate,' 'mob,' 'incited,' 'escalated,' 'irresponsible'
and 'immature.' 

"Mob of angry Slavs" is the phrase of choice indicating the mental
image intended for the reader. And it is have some effect. Yesterday on one
of the major American liberal news Websites a press wire headline read:
"Anti-Albanian Riots Explode In Macedonia."

'HONEY, IS SOMETHING MISSING FROM THE ANTI-ALBANIAN RIOTS?' 'WHY YES,
DEAR, THEY AREN'T ANTI-ALBANIAN.'

We have read a dozen or so reports on the protests and saw nothing
factual to suggest an anti-Albanian flavor. Rather, even in these hostile
Western media reports one could see that the protesters were focused and
informed, with clear political, not ethnic, targets: NATO, the U.S.,
Britain and Germany, all for their role in undermining Macedonian
sovereignty and assisting the so-called NLA terrorists. And really,
shouldn't 
they be angry? NATO (led by the U.S.) is after all trying to destroy
their country and their lives. (2)

But "crowd of angry Slavs" is the message that Western officials and
their always-obliging media are drilling into the public's imagination.

Make no mistake, these distortions have a purpose: to dehumanize the
victims of what is in fact going on in Macedonia, that is, large scale
ethnic cleansing and national destruction

As has been the case throughout the assault on Yugoslavia, the tone of
Imperial war propaganda is faux-liberal.

Here's how it worked starting with the secession of Croatia and
Slovenia back in 1991, and, alas, how it is still working today.

A secessionist force is organized by the U.S. and or Germany and or
England. This Western proxy force draws on elements which hark back to the
old Nazi alliance of World War II (3) - in this case, the descendents
of pro-Nazi Albanians, mainly from Kosovo. This force is ordered to
attack, a process the media misdescribes as a rebellion by an oppressed
local population. The fascist flavor of the 'rebels' is hidden from
Western eyes. (In this case, we hear little about the rallying cry of the
NATO proxy army attacking Macedonia, which is "Greater Albania," i.e., the
re-creation of the map of the Balkans that existed only under Hitler.)
Moreover, most of the media ignores the easily documented involvement
of Western operatives (in this case the official NATO organization in
Kosovo) in sponsoring and directing the attack. (4) The attempts of the
nation under attack to defend itself are misdescribed as brutal
repression and the victims are accused of racism.

What is the goal of this propaganda today? To prevent the development
of a support movement for Macedonia among the public in NATO countries.
The logical basis for supporting Macedonia is that a) it is the victim
of Imperial attack, organized from Washington and b) it is being
attacked on a racist basis, i.e. the attack appeals to anti-Slavic racism
within the Albanian populations of the area. To prevent this kind of
support movement from developing, the Western media and government officials
turn matters upside down, portraying Macedonians as ethnic chauvinists
and opponents of peace. One might call this strategy "Outflanking
opposition from the Left." By feeding Western citizens the lie that
Macedonia's "problem" is discrimination against Albanians which has spawned
an 
"extremist" response, direct NATO intervention and occupation of
territory can be presented as "peacekeeping" to "rebuild civil society" and
other fairy tales. 

The propaganda works. After she had watched the TV news, a decent but
uninformed American told one of us, "It's a mess over there - I guess we
better do something." Little did she know: 'we' have!

President Bush's brief visit to the massive U.S. military base
("Bondsteel" of all things) in Kosovo Tuesday was meant to deliver a message
about Macedonia. Or rather, several messages.

MESSAGE ONE: THE MEANING OF KOSOVO

First, he said Kosovo is for Washington the model of progress through
intervention. He told U.S. troops (and, of course, the world):

"Thanks to you and those who served before you, the people of Kosovo
are able to buy food and find shelter, go to school, and get medical
help." 

Since Kosovo's current reality is that an estimated 350,000
non-Albanians and anti-fascist Albanians have been driven from their homes
and are 
refugees in Serbia or elsewhere, or are dead, since the remaining Serbs
and Roma ("Gypsies") live in conditions of terror, including daily
beatings rape and murder, and we have documented the fact of this terror,
since the U.S. has created in Kosovo a regime of open gangsterism - for
Bush to say: 

"the people of Kosovo are able to buy food and find shelter, go to
school, and get medical help."

means that fascist tyranny is the U.S. model for progress; thus in
Macedonia as well. (5)

Bush called for: 

"a political settlement that 'addresses the legitimate grievance of the
Albanian population while protecting Macedonia's sovereignty and
territorial integrity.'

Since in fact the issue in Macedonia has nothing whatsoever to do with
"legitimate grievances" but rather involves an invasion by U.S.-armed
terrorists, what is this but a call for the Macedonians to surrender.
Bush emphasized that such was his intent by the almost funny way he
"threatened" the KLA terrorists (many of them UN-employed!) who are
attacking Macedonia:

"..he also urged Kosovo Albanians to stop fueling the Macedonian
conflict and 'focus on Kosovo.'"

Surely that sent terror through the ranks of the KLA or NLA or Kosovo
Protection Corps - or NATO! - take your pick.

MESSAGE TWO: "LISTEN UP YOU DARN ALBANIANS!"

All of this constitutes a message also to those whom NATO's "NLA" proxy
army has been targeting for recruits: Macedonians of Albanian descent.
These ethnic Albanians have not been sufficiently receptive to the mix
of terror and promises of 'Greater Albania' which the Kosovo Liberation
Army invaders have used in the effort to elicit their "participation"
in the "rebellion." Bush is telling these ethnic Albanians: Kosovo is
our model. We are backing the terrorist secessionists in Macedonia just
as strongly as we backed them in Kosovo, so join up or when our boys
take over you can kiss your behind goodbye. This, as we have discussed
elsewhere, is the basic 'recruiting' strategy of the U.S. proxy force, the
Kosovo Liberation Army. (6)

If you think this sounds terribly conspiratorial, that a U.S. president
would never promise ethnic harmony and deliver racist terror, just read
the article, "What NATO Occupation Would Mean For Macedonians." Prior
to occupation, NATO promised everything to Serbs in Kosovo. After
occupation, it delivered a nightmare. (7)

MESSAGE THREE: THE U.S. IS READY TO OPENLY SEND IN TROOPS

But perhaps the key thing said by Bush was:

"America's contribution is essential, both militarily and politically."
('N.Y. Times,' 25 July 2001).

Many people were fooled by Bush's election promise to pull out of the
Balkans. Instead of pulling out, he has continued with Clinton's
policies, including the attack on Macedonia and the further encirclement of
Russia with NATO bases. The continuity of these policies from elder Bush
to Clinton to baby Bush means that U.S. policy is not dependent on the
whims or personal economic interests of members of this or that US
presidential administration, but rather is part of far-ranging strategic
goals of the U.S. establishment, that is, the financial interests usually
called Wall Street. The big prize is the former Soviet Union, the
attempted conquest of which requires securing the Balkans as the southern
staging ground for attack.

The "Kosovication" of Macedonia is part of that strategy. Bush's trip
set the stage for a greatly intensified attack, including heightened
demonization of Macedonia in the Western media, and direct NATO
intervention. An ominous note: the U.S. is pulling its Embassy personnel out
of 
Skopje. That is precisely what the U.S. did before bombing Yugoslavia.
(7)

And of course, the story below says it all: the Macedonians' justified
protests at NATO's sponsorship of terrorist invaders can be used as an
excuse for - NATO invasion!




_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________




Reply via email to