From: Stasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 4:22 AM
Subject: SCMP: Washington, Beijing Deadlocked in Missile Dispute


HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------




> South China Morning Post
>
> Friday, November 23, 2001
> Washington, Beijing deadlocked in missile dispute
>
> REUTERS in Beijing
>
> Updated at 5.29pm:
> The US-led war on terrorism has lent urgency to American efforts to curb
> Chinese sales of weapons of mass destruction, but bilateral talks planned
> for next week appear unlikely to break a deadlock on non-proliferation.
>
>
> The dispute is one of the most sensitive issues simmering beneath the
> surface of a newfound friendship based on China's support for the US-led
war
> on terrorism.
>
>
> The United States is hoping the September 11 attacks on US soil will
> encourage Beijing to abide by a deal not to transfer missile technology to
> nations Washington calls ''rogue states'' or ''state sponsors of
> terrorism'', according to US officials.
>
>
> ''In our view, the ball's in their court,'' said one US official, who
> declined to be identified. ''It's up to them to do what's necessary to
> resume full implementation of the arrangement on their side.''
>
>
> ''They can see the new kind of world we're all in, the new kind of
> relationship they can have with the US,'' he added. ''The ability of that
> relationship to reach its full extent is going to be limited by this
missile
> problem if it's not resolved.''
>
>
> The two sides struck a deal a year ago under which the mainland pledged
not
> to help any country develop ballistic missiles that can carry nuclear
> warheads and the United States agreed to resume processing licences for
> space co-operation.
>
>
> But Washington has accused Beijing of violating the deal and in September
> imposed sanctions on a Chinese firm it said exported missile parts to
> Pakistan. China denies breaking the agreement and wants the sanctions
lifted
> and the licences issued.
>
>
> Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Wang Guangya will meet US Undersecretary of
> State John Bolton in Washington on November 30 to try to resolve the
> impasse, the US official said.
>
>
> ''We have nothing new to add,'' a spokesman from the Arms Control
Department
> of the Chinese Foreign Ministry said.
>
>
> ''China's stand on arms control is clear and we have repeated it on many
> occasions.''
>
>
> US officials highlighted Chinese sales of missile technology to countries
> including Pakistan and Iran before September 11 as a key issue in the
> bilateral relationship.
>
>
> But Washington is expected to drive an even harder line now to stop such
> technology falling into the hands of countries on a US State Department
list
> of ''state sponsors of terrorism''.
>
>
> ''Our hope is that September 11 will make it more understandable to the
> Chinese side why it is we think these issues are so important and why it
is
> they need to take the necessary steps,'' the official said.
>
>
> Beijing argues that Chinese firms are either doing so without government
> knowledge or exporting technology not covered by the agreement with the
> United States.
>
>
> US officials have been urging China to draw up a list of materials covered
> by the agreement to avoid future ambiguities.
>
>
> Some Beijing-based diplomats say China was planning to produce the list
when
> US President George W. Bush met President Jiang Zemin for the first time
in
> Shanghai in October. Beijing decided otherwise when the sanctions were
> imposed, they said.
>
>
> The US official admitted next week's talks alone were unlikely to resolve
> the stalemate.
>
>
> ''Historically, it's taken some number of months to get from a low point
> like sanctions and then getting up out of the hole and making forward
> progress again.''
>
>

_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  _________________

Reply via email to