From: "Macdonald Stainsby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: [L-I] Bush About to Announce Withdrawal From ABM Treaty

December 11, 2001

Bush About to Announce Withdrawal From ABM Treaty
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


Filed at 8:04 p.m. ET


WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush, eager to deploy a missile shield long
sought
by Republicans, soon will give Russia notice that the United States is
withdrawing from a landmark 1972 arms-control treaty, U.S. government
officials
said Tuesday. The pact bans missile defense systems.

Bush will invoke a clause in the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty that requires
the
United States and Russia to give six months' notice before abandoning the
pact,
the sources said.

Initial White House plans were to announce the decision Thursday, but
officials
cautioned the date could change. One source said formal notice would be
issued
in January. The four government officials spoke on condition of anonymity.

``The time is coming when we will need to move beyond the ABM treaty,'' said
Sean McCormack, a White House spokesman. Last Thursday, a group of Russian
military officials on a visit to Washington told private American
arms-control
experts they expected the Bush administration to give notice of withdrawal
over
the year-end holidays.

Bush told Putin during their autumn talks in China that he would withdraw
from
the ABM in January even if Russia had not agreed to a deal by then.

With the decision, Bush takes a huge step toward fulfilling a campaign
pledge to
develop and deploy an anti-missile system that he says will protect the
United
States and its allies, including Russia, from missiles fired by rogue
nations.

Bush has said the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks heightened the need for such a
system.

Russia and many U.S. allies have warned Bush that withdrawing from the pact
might trigger a nuclear arms race. Critics of the plan also question whether
an
effective system can be developed without enormous expense.

Conservative Republicans have urged Bush to scuttle the ABM, rejecting
proposals
to amend the pact or find loopholes allowing for tests.

The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Bob Stump, R-Ariz., said
he
has received no advance tip from the administration, but he backs the plan.

``There's all these questions about Russia upholding their end of the treaty
anyway, and I just don't think we should penalize ourselves,'' Stump said.
``We
shouldn't delay our ballistic missile defense. If it takes withdrawing from
the
ABM treaty, that's fine.''

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., told CNN he was opposed to
pulling
out of the pact. ``It is not a good idea. It would be a real setback for
defense
and foreign policy to violate the ABM treaty.'' He added: ``It's a slap in
the
face for many people who have committed years if not decades'' to arms
control.

The president defended his push for a missile shield during a national
security
speech Tuesday at the Citadel in South Carolina.

``For the good of peace, we're moving forward with an active program to
determine what works and what does not work,'' Bush said. ``In order to do
so,
we must move beyond the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, a treaty that
was
written in a different era, for a different enemy.''

``America and our allies must not be bound to the past. We must be able to
build
the defenses we need against the enemies of the 21st century,'' he said.

According to Bush administration officials, Russian President Vladimir Putin
had
assured Bush during their October talks in Washington and Crawford, Texas,
that
U.S.-Russian relations would not suffer even if Bush pulled out of the
treaty.

They said Bush's decision reflects a desire by the Pentagon to conduct tests
in
the next six months or so that would violate the ABM.

Tests may be conducted on sea-based radars and missile interceptors, which
could
be fielded in combination with the land-based systems that the Pentagon has
been
testing for years and which are permitted under the treaty.

The Pentagon later might test space-based missile defense technologies.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said that even after the
administration
gave notice of its intent to withdraw, the administration would be
interested in
continuing discussions with the Russians on an arrangement to replace the
ABM
treaty. If that produced agreement within six months, there would be no need
for
a formal withdrawal.

The decision came as Secretary of State Colin Powell, in Moscow, said Russia
and
the United States are near agreement on drastic cuts in long-range nuclear
arsenals.

But the U.S.-Russian disagreement over missile defense is so deep that
Russia is
bracing for the possibility of a U.S. withdrawal from the landmark ABM
treaty,
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov told a joint news conference with
Powell on
Monday.

Another major nuclear treaty, the 1993 START II treaty to reduce stockpiles
of
long-range nuclear warheads to 3,000 to 3,500 by 2003, appeared to be in
jeopardy.

The Cold War-era ABM treaty is based on the proposition that stripping a
nuclear
power of a tough defense against missile attack would inhibit launching an
attack because the retaliation would be deadly.

Past supporters of the treaty, such as former Secretary of State Henry A.
Kissinger, support Bush in his view the world has changed over the past
three
decades.

Russia is no longer an enemy, and the United States needs to mount a defense
against potential attack from North Korea, Iran or other states with nuclear
ambitions, they say.

But Jack Mendelsohn, a former U.S. negotiator, sharply criticized Bush's
decision.

At a time when the United States seeks allied support in coalition
operations
against terrorism, Mendelsohn said Tuesday ``to unilaterally abrogate part
of a
formal treaty structure makes no bloody sense.''




-------------------------------------------
Macdonald Stainsby
Rad-Green List: Radical anti-capitalist environmental discussion.
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
----
Leninist-International: Building bridges in the tradition of V.I. Lenin.
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
----
In the contradiction lies the hope.
                                     --Bertholt Brecht



_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ________________

Reply via email to