On Tuesday 01 February 2005 04:44 am, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:59 AM, boblq wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 February 2005 12:41 am, Neil Schneider wrote:
> >> Please don't post complete articles to the lists. This is a copyright
> >> violation and could cause all of us grief. Excerpts are ok, at least
> >> under my understanding of "fair use", with a URL for anyone interested
> >> in reading the full article. KPLUG can't afford to be sued for
> >> copyright violation, and unless you're incredibly rich, you probably
> >> can't either.
> >
> > Just as a practical question. When was the last time such a suit
> > happened? Please cite an example.
>
> http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/distance.htm
>
> "You are on Firm Ground When Your Use Involves:
>      * Comment, criticism, news reporting, parody (Campbell v.
> Acuff-Rose)
>            o Still, you must take all 4 factors into consideration: Los
> Angeles
>                       Times v. Free Republic (posting of full text of 
> articles on website,
>                       even for "criticism and comment" is not a fair use)"
>
> > PS. I have an alternative defense. I am incredibly poor ;)
>
> Easy solution--toss you in jail.

Please. Cite an instance where someone has been put in jail for
posting a newspaper article to a mailing list. I still am not 
convinced this is risky behavior. Illegal perhaps, but risky?
Really? Ah come on. 

> However, I argue for links from a much different angle.  First, the
> people
> providing the article really deserve to have you look at their website.
>   If
> they took the time to compile it, I can stare at the various
> banners/ads/etc.
> buried in the article as long as they don't get aggressive (ie. opening
> crap
> on my computer, starting flash or requiring registration).
>
> Second, often the articles I get provide extra diagrams, links,
> context, etc.
> that will not come through in my mail.  The link is a better idea.
>
> Third, I like to have the original link because it gives me the ability
> to
> judge the veracity, authority, and bias of the source site.
>
> -a

I like all of those answers and agree with them. 

I notice that many of your posts wrap poorly. Perhaps you
could use shorter lines. 

bobblq


-- 

KPLUG-List mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to