On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:15:00 +0700, Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it even have a journalled fs? I won't go without one anymore. It > doesn't have reiser either which is my favorite. It's missing a lot of > commercial support if you ever want to run a commercial application on > it. No SE Linux or other style mandatory access control is there? I > think it has SMP now although probably not as mature as Linux's SMP > since it has been around so much longer. We gave up BSD in the very > early days of MP3 in large part due to lack of SMP support. Less driver > support also. More people are familiar with Linux if you are looking for > employees. Wow. I never realized BSD was so lacking. > BSD is cool and all but I don't see a whole lot of reasons to > run it other than for religious or nostalgic reasons. I've always thought that, if you want a *really* secure box (you're a Colombian drug lord, say...) then you'd go BSD. Of course, SELinux would be nice if the sysadmin knew how to use it. -todd -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
