On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 11:19, Steve Bibayoff wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Apr 9, 2005 4:37 AM, RBW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The funny thing about this piece of information that got forwarded to me
> > is that the majority of the target user base has not heard of this
> > impending event... At All...
> 
> This article is misleading, and I believe most users assumptions of
> what Automatic Update is is closer to the procedures that are going to
> happen.
> 
> What is actually happening, is apparently if you have automatic
> updates enabled on your Windows Xp box, there was on option to still
> get automatic updates, but not actually update to sp2. imho, most
> people who would enable automatic updates are going to want the
> latest(and may or may not be greatest) Windows form MS.
> 
> > I predict a LOT of confusion and angst are in store for more than half
> > the computer using world...
> 
> The only segment of the "computer using world" that is really affected
> by this is the companies that have an actual testing procedure in
> place before they upgrade anything. I have personally seen very few
> companies like that.
> 
> 
> > Wouldn't it be interesting if this resulted in additional openings for
> > the Linux distros targeting the desktop? Lindows/Linspire could generate
> > some press from this as could NDL (Novell Desktop Linux) and maybe
> > others.
> 
> I don't think that anybody pro-linux/anti-Microsoft could produce any
> type of positive press from this. Any attempt would most likely
> generate a clarification from MS which makes the person issuing the
> press release look like they don't know the issues.
> 
> 
> m2c, and sorry about being OT(I personally won't respond anymore to this 
> topic)
> 
> Steve

Cool...
Good points none-the-less...

We'll see ;^)

RBW

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to