On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
> 
> On Apr 20, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Stewart Stremler wrote:
> 
> >I think Linspire is targeting the folks who /don't/ have such an
> >acquaintance yet.
> >
> >On the other hand, it sounds like a great business opportunity for  
> >those
> >who are interested in such things.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> The people who most need help are also the ones least willing to pay  
> for it.
> 
> Businesses are similar; only they generally have backups.  It's  
> called <sigh> -- paper.
> 
> Sadly, my normal prognosis for a dead Windows machine for most small  
> businesses (< 10 people) takes about 5 minutes:
> 
> "First, you need at least a new hard drive given the virus infested,  
> spyware laden, piece of crap that was the old drive.  Given that a  
> cheap new computer will be marginally more, have a new pristine copy  
> of Windows as well as the latest anti-virus--go buy one.
> 
> Second, I can probably recover your data.  It's probably stored in  
> slightly encoded form by some random Visual Basic application that  
> you use and is only marginally garbled.  However, you likely have  
> paper copies of all of your important receipts, invoices, etc.   
> Paying an individual to retype all of that data at minimum wage will  
> probably be cheaper than paying me to scavenge the hard drive.
> 
> Third, no user other than the CEO/President is to have install  
> authority on this new computer.  *Ever*.
> 
> Fourth, buy me lunch and we'll call it even."
> 
> I have never had anybody take me up on the scavenge the hard drive  
> option.  The advice generally holds for about 6 months and folks  
> start installing crap on the computer, again.  Repeat process in 2  
> years.
> 
> Guess what?  That totals to about $500-$600 spent on computers every  
> 2-3 years.  It's hard to compete with that.
> 
> Or, in management-speak:
> "System administration is a negative deliverable.  You only notice  
> its absence when something bad happens."
> 
> -a

What a discouraging post. Accurate, I'm sure. Just sad.

My reading: Those who behave stupidly are acting in the most cost
effective way.

-- 
Lan Barnes                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist     858-354-0616
-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to