On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:22:20AM +0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Lan Barnes wrote:
> > server on an abandoned secretarial desktop. My cunning plan is to
> > make the services it provides gradually migrate from conveniences to
> > strategic necessities, and _then_ suggest that maybe we should at least
> > use a cast-off server with a paid-up RHEL contract, just like real
> > businesses.
> 
> "I have a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a
> weasel!" - Edmund Blackadder
> 

Off to the sigs file with you!

> If you have your own in-house Linux talent you can do what we do: Use
> CentOS (www.centos.org). It is RHEL sources (made available to satisfy
> the GPL) which are recompiled back to binaries. 100% compatible with
> RHEL because it is RHEL minus the branding and commercial support. My
> company is standardized on CentOS 4 (RHEL4) for all of our servers and
> Fedora on the desktops. It is working out nicely so far.

I'm glad the RHEL versions are out there for this and another reason --
that it allows impoverished RH consultants an opportunity to familiarize
themselves with it.

However, I consider the paid support well worth the relative pittance RH
asks for RHEL for any company that has been writing checks to M$.

-- 
Lan Barnes                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist     858-354-0616
-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to