[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Johh H. Robinson, IV (attribution was lost, but is now found) > > Of course the FSF is going to fix this problem. They have successfully > > gotten people to change from the 4 clause BSD license to the 3 clause > > BSD license (the latter being GPL compatible). WHen that fails, a fork > > of the code or a re-write of it. > > Are the "people" you are referring to the OpenSSL gang? Are you > saying FSF salvaged /some/ OpenSSL code with relicensing but > not all of it? That'd be better than doing it ALL from scratch > I guess.
the ``people'' I am talking about were other projects. If OpenSSL was able to relices under a 3-clause BSD, there would be little need for GNUtls. I doubt any code from OpenSSL is finding its way into GNUtls for the simple reason is that it all has the 4-clause taint to it. Of course, I do not know for certain as I am on neither team. -john -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
