begin quoting DJA as of Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:57:01PM -0700: [snip] > Here's a better perspective explaining why the mark needs to be protected. > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050816092029989
I don't really see that there's a _need_. So what if M$ produces a M$ Windows Linux? It's that once you decide that M$ shouldn't have a Linux distro, and you trademark "Linux", you're not in a world of hurt in that you *have* to enforce the trademark on all, large or small. So we really should be a Linuxr user group! And paying $200/year, too. Looks like we finally have something to spend our raffle money on. -Stewart "Ready to use GNU/Linux(R)?" Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
