Stewart Stremler wrote:
It's the way of those in power and money. It's really up to the market
to make the decision... people should just refuse to buy copy-protected
works, end of story. If you are "required" to do so, sue whoever is
imposing the requirement, as that's an unjust imposition on you.
If nobody purchased copy-protected works, copy-protection is discarded.
We've seen this again and again and again. People can do without the
latest and greatest for a couple of years; the media companies cannot do
without a revenue stream for nearly as long. The power is in the market.
All in the market. And only in the market.
-Stewart "There's nothing copy-protected that I cannot do without." Stremler
This is what I have done. This is particularly so with music, since
there are so many ways I want to use it. I don't completely abstain, but
I probably went from a few hundred dollars a year on music and movies to
less than a hundred.
--
"Texas has a lot of electrical votes." -- During an election campaign,
after George Bush stated that Texas was important to the election.
--Yogi Bera
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
