[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- The internet has become an internationally important resource, and
having a nationalistic country control it is probably not a good plan
for the long run
That would make sense if all countries agreed to respect human rights
and freedom. No other country has as strong a history in this area
as US.
Why do all countries have to give those respects to be on the Internet ?
China, North Korea, Iran don't now and they're connected.
If you want it to be majority rules, then you shouldn't worry about the
UN takin control so long as it follows the majority rules discipline. If
on the other hand you want to follow the "The United States knows what's
best" policy, then leave it as it is, becoz God knows, the United States
would never try to stop people communicating, unless is violated some
corporations copyrights or patents....
--
Michael O'Keefe | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Live on and Ride a 03 BMW F650GSDakar| [EMAIL PROTECTED] / |
I like less more or less less than |Work:+1 858 845 3514 / |
more. UNIX-live it,love it,fork() it |Fax :+1 858 845 2652 /_p_|
My views are MINE ALONE, blah, blah, |Home:+1 760 788 1296 \`O'|
blah, yackety yack - don't come back |Fax :+1 858 _/_\|_,
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
