kelsey hudson wrote:
> Gus Wirth wrote:
>> If I do an NFS mount and copy a large file from the server to
>> /dev/null on the client or if I scp a file between the server and
>> client I get pretty much the same results, about 11MB (that's bytes)
>> per second. This is only about 10% better than 100baseT ethernet. I
>> know from previous experiments that my hard drives and general system
>> throughput can handle about 25MB/sec.
> 
> Many cheap gigabit switches aren't wirespeed. Also, beware the 32 bit,
> 33MHz PCI woes. 32/33 PCI is only capable of 132MByte/sec at maximum.
> Also keep in mind that other things are happening on PCI as you're doing
> the transfer, namingly slamming the hard disks, etc.
> 
>> So any hints on how to get this to work faster, or am I seeing the
>> results of a marketing scam?
> 
> Try a better switch. You may not need this many ports, but usually
> things with 24+ ports are better than consumer grade and offer better
> throughput. Also, try a better board, something with the intel E1000
> chipset or broadcom chipsets. also good is alteon acenic.
> 
> to isolate the switch as a potential choke point, connect a garden
> variety crossover (cat 6!) cable between the two machines and set IP
> addresses manually, etc., then start the copy. see if performance
> increases. also, make sure all your cables are cat6. cat5 wasn't meant
> for gigabit speeds. cat5e may be able to handle them but I think it's
> only rated to atm over copper speeds (155MBit/sec). so yeah. make sure
> you use new cables. generally, the machine-built ones are better than
> the hand-built ones, since the machine can align the wires better
> without removing twists.
> 
> if you ask me, there's only one way to do gigabit and get any proper
> performance/reliability out of it: 1000Base-SX; that is, gigabit over
> multimode fiber, and high-end equipment (boards and switches). at my
> house i have a cisco 3550 switch which has two GBIC ports; connected to
> these are SX GBICs -- one goes to my workstation which has one of the
> aforementioned AceNICs, the other will uplink to a second switch someone
> at work is giving me.
> 

Do you have any performance measurements on your home system?
..jim


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to