Lan Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:51:31PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > Lan Barnes wrote:
> > > 
> > > >From me the reply was.
> > 
> > *grr* I dislike all the From_ quoting. It seems something along the
> > pipeline is (erroneously) assuming that we are all storing email in an
> > mbox format.
> > 
> > >From the looks of it, I would say it is the mailman software. Copious
> > Bcc:'s to verify my claim.
> 
> Don't get too snippy ... my mail server is handled by a Very Wonderful
> Person who reads this list ;-)

I'm getting snippy at *MailMan*, the mailing list software that takes it
upon itself to modify the text of mail bodies WITH ABSOLUTELY NO GOOD
REASON.

This is akin to Reply-To: munging, except for the whole ``breaking
digital signatures'' (however, GPG and GnuPG come prepared for that) and
breaking of attachments.

Let the MDA handle From_ quoting, as the MDA is the only thing that
knows if it needs to be munged at all.

Look! I made a table!!

Service         From_ quoting
--------------- -------------
gmail           no
qmail           no
sparkplug       no
UCSD Groupwise  no
kplug-list      YES


There is something about the way kplug-list mail is handled that is
causing the From_ to be quoted. Uncessarly, as I have four examples
where it is not required at all.

the qmail, sparkplug, and kplug-list all had the same final destination,
how it got there varied:
qmail came straight to my system
sparkplug came to my system, via sparkplug (the same host that services
the list mail)
kplug-list went through spakplug, mailman, then my system here.

This is how I am able to determine that it is MailMan that is the
culprit. I don't know why t is doing it, but I do know that I do not
like it.

> > -john

Recycled .sigs!


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to