On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 03:58:19PM -0800, Stewart Stremler wrote: > Um, no, the reason copyright was "necessary" was because printing was > CHEAP, not because it was expensive.
Are you sure? A printer who 'steals' another printer's work might have *cheaper* expenses but is it really *cheap*? They must pay for the paper for *each* book. They must set the press for *each* page. Labor costs, materials costs, on and on. Doesn't look cheap to me. Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
