From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:30:29AM -0600, Gabriel Sechan wrote:
> THe idea of one language being better than another for "productivity" is
> pure bullshit. No language is more productive than any other, except
for
> personal experience in it. What tends to speed or not speed things up
is
> availability of libraries that can reduce the need to write code.
What do you mean? Do you mean if you know Lisp and assembly equally well
that
you'll be as productive in each? Even if you have same amount of libraries
in
each? I find that hard to believe.
I think you'd have a hard time finding someone who truely knew assembly and
Lisp equally well. But yes, if you had the same libraries for each, you'd
be equally productive in each.
Gabe
_________________________________________________________________
Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win?
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
