begin quoting Steven E. Harris as of Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:45:29AM -0800: > Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Footnotes work better if distinct symbols are used for each footnote. > > They are Unicode characters B9 (Superscript One), B2 (Superscript > Two), B3 (Superscript Three), courtesy of Emacs footnote-mode, > `numeric-latin' style..
Sure, blame Emacs. It's a plausible excuse. ;-) > Does your mail client not respect these headers? Don't know, don't care; if it's not ASCII, it shouldn't be in email. Besides, it's not a mail client issue, but what I set TERM to. > ,---- > | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > `---- > > Those are present on my messages that use three or less footnotes. For > others, the character set is even less ambitious: So far, I've only seen a problem with three or less footnotes. > ,---- > | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > `---- This is how it should be. Getting cute is just annoying. -- The slippery slope to chaos starts with extending ASCII. Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
