-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rick Funderburg wrote:
> Indeed.  But if you do want a reason to not like XHTML, you could claim 
> that it is poorly supported by browsers, since some browsers (like IE) 
> do not support the appropriate mime types[1].

Actually I think it is pretty well supported. There is only one modern
browser that really sucks at it.

- --
Tracy R Reed                  Read my blog at http://ultraviolet.org
Key fingerprint = D4A8 4860 535C ABF8 BA97  25A6 F4F2 1829 9615 02AD
Non-GPG signed mail gets read only if I can find it among the spam.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF3nhG9PIYKZYVAq0RAkHAAJ9tOhbdoDD3MQ/w+HWII91kzFvUQwCdG0WG
yq35iNbxLBEWJWRzprqBaKo=
=WwU8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to