From: "Christian Seberino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, March 26, 2007 3:17 pm, Gabriel Sechan wrote:
> You're self contradictory here. You say that marriage is the only
> acceptable outlet for sex. Then you claim marriage isn't (just) about
> sex.
> Then you say the religion isn't sexuall repressed. At least one of
these
> is
> not true.
What do you mean? Do you mean if marriage is about more than sex that
suddenly it can't satisfy that anymore? Linux is trying to be a excellent
desktop to compete for the end user. Does that mean it can't be a great
web server anymore?
As the only option, no it can't satisfy it. Not even close. A one shot
"til death to you part" chance to get it right does not satisfy the problem.
>> > Many people in this country have
>> > tried the sex without marriage route and it generally works pretty
>> well.
>>
>>Marriage basically is about a promise not to abandon someone. I think
>>most people want a promise like that. Whether sex without marriage
>> works
>>pretty well is a big question. I doubt it. I wonder if all the
>>out-of-wedlock children would agree with you that it works pretty well.
>>
> You think they'd prefer to not be born instead?
I think they'd prefer to be born into a home with married parents. Don't
you?
Quite frankly, no. If the parents don't love one another, they'll have a
better, happier home life with a single parent. I support child support
laws to help fiscally raise the children, but a single parent home is far
better than a house where parents are forced together because of a mistake
made a decade ago, leaving everyone unhappy.
Gabe
_________________________________________________________________
ItÂ’s tax season, make sure to follow these few simple tips
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?icid=HMMartagline
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
