The NSA has taken out some patents on speech
recognition(http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/199911/msg00055.html
). These projects must have been extremely large
projects. 


--- Rick Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Lan Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2007 12:08 am, Randall Shimizu
> wrote:
> >   
> >> If the NSA is searching for keywords in telephone
> calls then this means
> >> that they have a voice recognition cability that
> is far more advanced than
> >> anything that is commercially available....?? The
> only other possibility
> >> is that they are monitoring specific phone lines.
> This would give them the
> >> ability to train the voice software.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > If you know any of those key words, I'd appreciate
> seeing a list. I need
> > to spice up my conversation. I want to get my
> money's worth on my taxes.
> >   
> I just did a simple search on Google using 'NSA
> Keyword searches' 
> without the quotes and came up with:
> 
>
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html
> 
> HOW THE NSA SEARCHES FOR TARGETS
> There are a range of techniques that are probably
> used by the NSA to 
> sift through the sea of communications it steals
> from the world's cables 
> and airwaves:
> 
>     * *Keywords.* In this longstanding technique,
> the agency maintains a
>       watch list or "dictionary" of key words,
> individuals, telephone
>       numbers and presumably now computer IP
> addresses. It uses that
>       list to pick out potentially relevant
> communications from all the
>       data that it gathers. These keywords are often
> provided to the NSA
>       by other security agencies, and the NSA passes
> the resulting
>       intelligence "take" back to the other agencies
> or officials.
>       According to the law, the NSA must strip out
> the names and other
>       identifying information of Americans captured
> inadvertently, a
>       process called "minimization." (According to
> published reports,
>       those minimization procedures are not being
> properly observed.) In
>       the 1990s, it was revealed that the NSA had
> used the word
>       "Greenpeace" and "Amnesty" (as in the human
> rights group Amnesty
>       International) as keywords as part of its
> "Echelon" program (see
>       Echelon
>      
>
<http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html#echelon>).
> 
>     * *Link analysis.* It is believed that another
> manner in which
>       individuals are now being added to the watch
> lists is through a
>       process often called "link analysis." Link
> analysis can work like
>       this: the CIA captures a terrorist's computer
> on the battlefield
>       and finds a list of phone numbers, including
> some U.S. numbers.
>       The NSA puts those numbers on their watch
> list. They add the
>       people that are called from those numbers to
> their list. They
>       could then in turn add the people called from
> those numbers to
>       their list. How far they carry that process
> and what standards if
>       any govern the process is unknown.
>     * *Other screening techniques.* There may be
> other techniques that
>       the NSA could be using to pluck out potential
> targets. One example
>       is voice pattern analysis, in which computers
> listen for the sound
>       of, say, Osama Bin Laden's voice. No one knows
> how accurate the
>       NSA's computers may be at such tasks, but if
> commercial attempts
>       at analogous activities such as face
> recognition are any guide,
>       they would also be likely to generate enormous
> numbers of false hits.
> 
> http://www.nsawatch.org/networks.html
> 
> *United States - Oasis & Fluent 
>
<http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57318-2001Mar25.html>
> *United States intelligence officials have developed
> two programs which 
> many experts believe may be used to enhance
> ECHELON's capabilities. 
> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/8/17361.html>
> One of these 
> programs, Oasis, automatically creates
> machine-readable transcripts from 
> television and audio broadcasts. Reports indicate
> that Oasis can also 
> distinguish individual speakers and detect personal
> characteristics 
> (such as gender) then denote these characteristics
> in the transcripts it 
> creates. The other program, FLUENT, allows
> English-language keyword 
> searches of non-English materials. This data mining
> tool not only finds 
> pertinent documents, but also translates them,
> although the number of 
> languages that can currently be translated is
> apparently limited 
> (Russian, Chinese, Portuguese, Serbo-Croatian,
> Korean and Ukrainian). In 
> addition, FLUENT displays the frequency with which a
> given word is used 
> in a document and can handle alternate search term
> spellings.
> 
> I haven't found any specific words or terms beyond
> the obvious but you 
> would expect them to change rapidly. I should
> imagine that anyone 
> discussing current news events would be suspect
> given that many if not 
> most Americans do not read newspapers or follow what
> is going on except 
> for Paris Hilton, et al.
> 
> I am sure that Neil Schneider is on their 'watch'
> list.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Rick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> [email protected]
>
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
> 


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to