Lan Barnes wrote:
I think what we're witnessing is svn's living up to its charter, to "be a compelling replacement for cvs."
I agree.
That's not a very high bar to clear. svn has the advantage of practically dropping in for cvs in user skills needed. But we could have hoped for more. Still, improvement is improvement.
We could have hoped for more, but I'm not sure we could have expected it. People understand centralized command-and-control structures. What more could be done with a VCS without throwing that out? -a -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
