On Sun, August 19, 2007 3:06 pm, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > Lan Barnes wrote: >> I think what we're witnessing is svn's living up to its charter, to "be >> a >> compelling replacement for cvs." > > I agree. > >> That's not a very high bar to clear. svn >> has the advantage of practically dropping in for cvs in user skills >> needed. >> >> But we could have hoped for more. Still, improvement is improvement. > > We could have hoped for more, but I'm not sure we could have expected it. > > People understand centralized command-and-control structures. > > What more could be done with a VCS without throwing that out? > > -a
Branches. Tags. Stored metadata. Jobs. Change sets. Top of my head ... -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
