On Thu, September 13, 2007 12:34 pm, Bob La Quey wrote:
> On 9/13/07, Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, September 13, 2007 10:08 am, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
>> > On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Lan Barnes wrote:
>> >
>> >> <sigh> Gues I'm on my own. Best to Ralph.
>> >
>> > I've installed MH on RHEL, but I've never actually used it.
>> >
>> > Gregory
>> >
>>
>> I'm unhappy with how I handle mail. I was happy when I used fetchmail to
>> bring it local and used mutt/vi, but the server that I used had a crisis
>> and I've been living with a browser interface ever since that has all
>> the
>> disadvantages of browser interfaces I dislike so much.
>>
>
> Well I hate to be a party pooper but I suggest that you
> at least try gmail, browser interface and all, before
> you go to the troubleof rolling your own. You can have
> your old address forwarded to gmail so you don't lose
> any contacts.
>
> gmail has filtering capabilities as good a s any clinet
> that I have used (Eudora and KMail mostly) and has far
> better search capabilites. There is a builitin address
> book that I can search easily as well.
>
> It works for me. I have nor motivation at this time to
> hunt anything better.
>
> It costs nothing but some time to try it and the trial
> might well convince you that web based mail is not all
> that bad.
>
> As usual, YMMV, etc.
>
> BobLQ
>

Thanks, and I always appreciate when people address the underlying mission
in addition to the proposed method. But I have been so very happy not
using gmail that I fear to mess with that.

-- 
Lan Barnes

SCM Analyst              Linux Guy
Tcl/Tk Enthusiast        Biodiesel Brewer


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to