On Feb 15, 2008 3:15 PM, Tyrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do wish someone would explain the attraction to amarok, I tried it and > was totally unimpressed. I really do like rythmbox, it's easy to use and > has a good layout. Amarok seemed way too cluttered and seemed to have > odd ways of doing things. I don't have it on this machine right now, > but I will install it as soon as I'm done writing this so I will take a > look at it again and invite people to point out it's great features that > I may have missed before.
Amarok: - Has a file browser! I sometimes pull in a mess of mp3s and then start cleaning id3 tags based on what directory they're in. - Has a nifty "Content" pane that shows artist info, lyrics, and album contents. - Minimizes to the quick launcher area. Shouldn't Rhythmbox do that too? Maybe it does. - Integration with last.fm. (and Magnatune, though I don't know what that is and I don't use it) -todd -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
