begin quoting James G. Sack (jim) as of Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:51:30AM -0700: > /SJS wrote: > >.. > > There ought to be a place for "reasonable use". If our etiquette can't > > accomodate that, then it's broken. > > > > (McQuary's Limit was a 'reasonable use' compromise, for example. I'm > > not seeing much compromise from the don't-steal-my-bandwidth camp.) > > I can't seem to find what McQuary's Limit is. > > Ref/Def please? (if not already in a later point of this thread).
http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/jargon/html/M/McQuary-limit.html 4-lines-by-80-characters for a signature. It's a compromise between I-should-be-able-to-express-myself and I'm-paying-for-this-bandwidth-you-jerk viewpoints. -- No compromise, no agreement, I'll give you overshoes, made of ce-ment. Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
