Carl Lowenstein wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:51 AM, James G. Sack (jim) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> /SJS wrote: >> >.. >> > There ought to be a place for "reasonable use". If our etiquette can't >> > accomodate that, then it's broken. >> > >> > (McQuary's Limit was a 'reasonable use' compromise, for example. I'm >> > not seeing much compromise from the don't-steal-my-bandwidth camp.) >> >> I can't seem to find what McQuary's Limit is. >> >> Ref/Def please? (if not already in a later point of this thread). > > Cited in Jan 23 2008 KPLUG-main in a different thread. > > <http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/jargon/html/M/McQuary-limit.html> > > <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mcquary+limit&btnG=Google+Search>
OK, thanks for the search tip: I got no 4-or-so irrelevant hits when I used a "'s". ==> I should have dropped the possessive ending. (I maybe also should have known to try the jargon file, eh?) Regards. ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
