On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:51 AM, James G. Sack (jim) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /SJS wrote: > >.. > > There ought to be a place for "reasonable use". If our etiquette can't > > accomodate that, then it's broken. > > > > (McQuary's Limit was a 'reasonable use' compromise, for example. I'm > > not seeing much compromise from the don't-steal-my-bandwidth camp.) > > I can't seem to find what McQuary's Limit is. > > Ref/Def please? (if not already in a later point of this thread).
Cited in Jan 23 2008 KPLUG-main in a different thread. <http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/jargon/html/M/McQuary-limit.html> <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mcquary+limit&btnG=Google+Search> carl -- carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
