---------------------------------------- > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:43:51 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: kplug-list@kernel-panic.org > Subject: Re: Schooling funding debate ... again (Was Re: Wifi leeches (Was: > Multiple NAT layers)) > > Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Yes, their time is valuable. >>> It is also because they just want to get in there and teach. They >>> don't want >>> to spend how ever long it takes to get some credential. They just want >>> to get in there and teach. >> >> You are simply wrong. You have no data. And you don't even have >> personal experience from which to posit. >> >> Look, you're talking to someone who teaches and hangs around with >> other folks who teach. Yeah, it's not data. However ... >> >> If any of us wanted to teach high school, we would. Some of us >> have--none have done it a second time. We would get and have gotten >> the credentials and the background check (don't forget that, too). >> It's just not that hard. >> >> And, again, I'm going to state, if you can't be bothered to pass that >> minimal a set of requirements, you don't deserve to be teaching. Sorry. > > And you don't deserve to meddle with the teachings in the home. Sorry. > Wrong. Society has a requirement to do so. An education is not a gift to your child, it's your child's *right*. You have no right to comprimise it. If you're capable of providing a minimal level, that's fine. But to protect your children's rights, society has not only a reason but the duty to ensure that they receive their full due. If that means interfering with what you want, too damn bad.
Gabe _________________________________________________________________ Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008 -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
