> I presume you mean "faster than C code". Of course, there was a time > where the statement was "there isn't one thing a C project can do faster > than an assembly project". Both statements are incorrect for some pretty > important things like "get done" or "fix bugs". Even outside of the > human factors side of things, there are other issues to consider. A nice
A few newbie questions here. I thought that the lower level the code, the faster it runs. So C runs faster than VB but Assembly runs faster than C. I do realize it's also the talent of the programmer. What is Java considered? And is C a middle or low level programming language? > The primary reason for this in my experience has been the poor support > for Java on Linux. What has been common, particularly in the past, has > been "We would like this to run on Unix, what's the best route? Port the > Win32 code base to Java!". What do you mean by poor support on Linux? -- Gossamer Axe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
