From: Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gabriel Sechan wrote:
Classes and functions are orthogonal, they aren't a replacement for each other. Classes are a collection of data and functions that work on that data.
A hard core OOP person would argue that a function is just a simple case where a class has no data and one function.
And I'd note that he has a recursive definition on his hands. I'd also ask how using such a definition would possibly make a program better. At the end of which I'd probably be trying not to laugh, and I'd be reassured in my main reason for using C over C++ - that OOP people really overcomplicate simple things.
Gabe
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
