begin quoting Andrew Lentvorski as of Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 04:18:45PM -0700: [snip] > A hard core function person would argue that classes are just generic > type-dispatchable functions whether the first argument is always the > class instance.
Which was, in fact, _exactly_ how OOP was first describe to me. And C++ was the first "OOP" language I was introduced to. It didn't take, and I was an anti-OOP loudmouth until a (respected) friend took me aside and said "don't use C++ as an example of what an OOP language is like, learn a different OOP language before you finalize your opinion". (Or words to that effect.) So I did. And he was right. -Stewart "But I still don't want to program with a mouse in hand" Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
