On Jan 2, 2008 11:17 PM, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob La Quey wrote:
> >
> > I gotta say though I will _not_ employ any programmer who considers
> > these issues religious. If you really cannot read indented Python
> > code then I suppose there are other places, like the university?,
> > where you can push your biases upon the unwitting.
>
> You really have a big problem with Academia, don't you?
>
> -john

Actually yes I do. I spent a decade in academia and left
with a real frustration over the degree to which egos ran
rampant and bureaucracies were growing like wild fire. This
was almost thirty years ago. About all I see that has changed
is, well nothing. The bureaucracies are simply larger.

I could have stayed there indefinitely and made
a small academic industry of just that one equation,
the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation. All I had to
do was from 1973 on to publish perhaps one paper
each year dealing with this equation, which I had
derived as a description of nonlinear ion acoustic
modes of oscillation of a Tokamak class plasma, Ta Da!
And yes one could be paid a reasonable professional
income to do this. ... The equation did not receive
its name until 1976 by which time I had not thought
about it for a couple of years.

The paper which gave Kuramoto the name was published as
Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki,
Persistent propagation of concentration waves in
dissipative media far from thermal equilibrium,
Prog. Theor. Phys. 55 (1976)

I do believe that the equation is properly named after
the two physicists who decided to spend their entire
lives exploring this equation though I do claim to have
derived the equation two years earlier and developed
some solutions to it. I was _not_ cut out to spend my
life that way in an academic environment. I do _not_
lose any sleep over having missed a big academic
opportunity.

The KS equation is a great example of a nonlinear partial
differential equation that exhibits a lot of interesting
behavior, e.g. solitons and chaotic behavior. So it supports
a few dozen academic experts.

Google "kuramoto sivashinsky equation" provides 16,500 hits.
For better or worse academics continue to write papers and
presumably find new and useful things to say about it ... See
for instance
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0951-7715/17/4/012/
matisse.ucsd.edu/~hwa/pub/ks2d.pdf

I do believe that there is a real place for academia and
for those personalities that fit such an environment. I am
not one. I enjoyed hanging out around a university for about
a decade but ultimately I decided I would rather free lance
and seek a freer less constrained (by discipline, ego and
bureaucracy) environment. I have never regretted the decision.

So I worked there long enough to see the sausage made and to
come to the conclusion that I was neither a maker nor a teacher
of sausage making.

So it goes,

BobLQ

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to