kplug-lpsg  

Messages by Date

• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] SJS
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Carl Lowenstein
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] treed
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] SJS
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] SJS
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Carl Lowenstein
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Bob La Quey
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/10/01 Re: Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Steve M Bibayoff
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/10/01 Emergency brakes [Was: Re: Computer science isn't science] Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Doug
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Bob La Quey
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science David Brown
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Ralph Shumaker
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Bob La Quey
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science David Brown
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science David Brown
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/10/01 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/09/30 Re: Computer science isn't science Bob La Quey
• 2008/09/30 Re: Computer science isn't science Doug
• 2008/09/30 Re: Computer science isn't science Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Christopher Smith
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Bob La Quey
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science treed
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science Darren New
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science SJS
• 2008/09/29 Re: Computer science isn't science treed
• 2008/09/29 Computer science isn't science treed
• 2008/09/24 [San-Diego-pm] Damian Conway is coming... Chris Grau
• 2008/09/20 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg Doug
• 2008/09/20 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg David Brown
• 2008/09/19 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg Tracy R Reed
• 2008/09/19 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg Doug
• 2008/09/19 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg Rick Funderburg
• 2008/09/19 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg SJS
• 2008/09/19 Re: Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg Rick Funderburg
• 2008/09/19 Project: Read-to-me Gutenberg George
• 2008/09/02 Re: Real World Haskell free online David Brown
• 2008/09/02 Real World Haskell free online treed
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Chuck Esterbrook
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Darren New
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Darren New
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue Christopher Smith
• 2008/08/18 Re: Interesting metaprogramming issue James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/08/18 Interesting metaprogramming issue Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/16 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/08/07 [JOB] In-House Applications Programmer/Developer Paul G. Allen
• 2008/08/05 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Bob La Quey
• 2008/08/05 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Darren New
• 2008/08/04 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Barry Gershenfeld
• 2008/08/03 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Bob La Quey
• 2008/08/03 Re: An interesting Forth discussion Darren New
• 2008/08/03 An interesting Forth discussion Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/07/11 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Darren New
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language chris
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Christopher Smith
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Christopher Smith
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Christopher Smith
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Darren New
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/07/10 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/07/09 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Darren New
• 2008/07/09 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Doug LaRue
• 2008/07/09 Re: Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Chuck Esterbrook
• 2008/07/09 Google NIH generates yet another incompatible data transfer language Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/06/20 RE: Floor(double) algorithm Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/06/18 Re: Floor(double) algorithm randall
• 2008/06/18 Re: Floor(double) algorithm Darren New
• 2008/06/18 Re: Floor(double) algorithm Carl Lowenstein
• 2008/06/18 Re: Floor(double) algorithm Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/06/18 Floor(double) algorithm Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/05/25 why is GNU Hurd *still* switching microkernel choices? chris
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd David Brown
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Tracy R Reed
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd David Brown
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd David Brown
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd David Brown
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Lan Barnes
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd Martin Franco
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd chris
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd chris
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd chris
• 2008/05/24 Re: gnu hurd chris
• 2008/05/23 RE: gnu hurd Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/05/23 Re: gnu hurd Martin Franco
• 2008/05/23 Re: gnu hurd Lan Barnes
• 2008/05/23 Re: auto pub key installer George Georgalis
• 2008/05/23 RE: gnu hurd Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/05/23 Re: gnu hurd SJS
• 2008/05/23 gnu hurd Martin Franco
• 2008/05/20 Re: auto pub key installer James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/05/20 auto pub key installer Tracy R Reed
• 2008/05/16 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Stewart C. Strait
• 2008/05/15 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/14 RE: Proof that old code never dies Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/05/14 Re: Proof that old code never dies Chuck Esterbrook
• 2008/05/14 Proof that old code never dies Gabriel Sechan
• 2008/05/14 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/13 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Chuck Esterbrook
• 2008/05/13 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? chris
• 2008/05/13 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? David Brown
• 2008/05/13 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Mark Schoonover
• 2008/05/13 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/12 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? SJS
• 2008/05/12 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? chris
• 2008/05/12 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? Bob La Quey
• 2008/05/12 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? chris
• 2008/05/12 Re: Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? David Brown
• 2008/05/12 Everyone gets "exhausted" from coding? Is full day's work a myth? chris
• 2008/05/06 Because I know there are Forth fans on this list Christopher Smith
• 2008/05/05 A discussion of development behind an MMORPG Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/27 Re: How get raw binary from an ELF file or GNU's as assembler? David Brown
• 2008/04/27 Re: How get raw binary from an ELF file or GNU's as assembler? chris
• 2008/04/27 Re: How get raw binary from an ELF file or GNU's as assembler? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/27 Re: How get raw binary from an ELF file or GNU's as assembler? Chris O'Brien
• 2008/04/27 How get raw binary from an ELF file or GNU's as assembler? chris
• 2008/04/22 Re: Nice article in praise of Tcl Lan Barnes
• 2008/04/22 Re: Nice article in praise of Tcl Bob La Quey
• 2008/04/22 Nice article in praise of Tcl Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/20 Python block delimeter tool just for SJS! chris
• 2008/04/14 On Pair Programming SJS
• 2008/04/13 Cobra 0.8 Released Chuck Esterbrook
• 2008/04/05 Re: HTDP = SICP quality free book? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/04 Re: HTDP = SICP quality free book? chris
• 2008/04/04 Re: HTDP = SICP quality free book? Carl Lowenstein
• 2008/04/04 Re: HTDP = SICP quality free book? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/04 HTDP = SICP quality free book? chris
• 2008/04/02 Re: The perfect language chris
• 2008/04/02 Re: The perfect language SJS
• 2008/04/02 Re: The perfect language James G. Sack (jim)
• 2008/04/02 Re: The perfect language Tracy R Reed
• 2008/04/02 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Darren New
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Carl Lowenstein
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Darren New
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Darren New
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures David Brown
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Andrew Lentvorski
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures Darren New
• 2008/04/01 Re: C++0X gets lambdas/closures David Brown

• Earlier messages
• Later messages