On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:39:54AM -0500, RBW1 wrote:
> > While thinking about other things, I came across a price page of
> > Linksys stuff, and noticed that the WET-11 bridge is considerably more
> > expensive than the all-purpose WRT-54G WAP/firewall/router box. Of
> > course the WRT-54G does not do `"bridge" but it does run Linux
> > internally.
> I use this and it works very well:
> http://www.portless.net/menu/ewrt/
i put openwrt on mine. (openwrt.org)
i am very happy with it. it uses ipkg, and there are a number of ipkg
repositores out there already. makes it very flexible to turn the box
into running what you want.
because anyone can just build packages for it, i believe openwrt has the
best chances to grow and stay around.
i didn't see any convenient package support for ewrt, though i could be
mistaken.
greetings, martin.
--
offering experience: sTeam, caudium, pike, roxen and unix sysadmin
doing: programming, training and administration. anywhere in the world
--
pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org
unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at
administrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.schon.org
Martin B�hr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
--
KPLUG-Steer mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
