On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:12:48PM -0700, Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:03:56PM -0700: > > John Alvarado and I just talked land line. I think it's important to get > > input from all the remaining SIGs (and even ask under the hood) before > > the next board meeting. > > > > Do others agree? How can we do that? > > If it turns in to -- or APPEARS to to so -- an unsanctioned meeting, > won't that result in a possibly unpleasant situation? > > When you start having meetings-that-aren't-meetings, perhaps it's wise > to first consult with a landshark? > > -Stewart
Fair enough. But it will have a bad odor if we go into the next board meeting strictly Kplug vs SDMUG. I know there is a lot of apathy out there. I don't condemn it. Sometimes apathy is an accurate reflection of a situation. Still, at least for one meeting of the SDCS board, it would seem important for all the SIGs to have representatives there. -- Lan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Guy, SCM Specialist 858-354-0616 -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
