Lan Barnes said:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:12:48PM -0700, Stewart Stremler wrote:
>> begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:03:56PM
>> -0700:
>> > John Alvarado and I just talked land line. I think it's important
>> to get
>> > input from all the remaining SIGs (and even ask under the hood)
>> before
>> > the next board meeting.
>> >
>> > Do others agree? How can we do that?
>>
>> If it turns in to -- or APPEARS to to so -- an unsanctioned meeting,
>> won't that result in a possibly unpleasant situation?
>>
>> When you start having meetings-that-aren't-meetings, perhaps it's
>> wise
>> to first consult with a landshark?
>>
>> -Stewart
>
> Fair enough. But it will have a bad odor if we go into the next board
> meeting strictly Kplug vs SDMUG.
>
> I know there is a lot of apathy out there. I don't condemn it.
> Sometimes
> apathy is an accurate reflection of a situation. Still, at least for
> one
> meeting of the SDCS board, it would seem important for all the SIGs to
> have representatives there.
I have been in phone contact with all the SIG leaders except John
Alvarado and the president of UCHUG. I excpect to speak with Greg
Skalka from UCHUG later this evening, when he gets home. They are
aware of the situation.
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed
by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing
about them. -- George Orwell
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
