Thanks for the info guys. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Phillip Hill <phill.hill at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I was thinking, just didn't know if there was some other > factor as to why it wouldn't be a good idea. I know in carbs, air velocity > and volume contribute to their efficiency and effectiveness. Some carbs > are designed for gravity feed and others pump feed, etc so obviously I'd > have to take that into consideration. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Dan Heath via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > wrote: > >> It is my opinion that given similar HP and performance, the carb should >> work very well. >> >> And, I don't think your results will vary. >> >> ________________________________________________________________ >> >> Now for the opinion portion of the show...would it be reasonable to >> assume that a MS carb designed for a particular engine be usable on >> another >> engine of a different mfg with similar HP and performance? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search. >> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org >> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to >> change options >> > >
